Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025
Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke
Published on: July 26, 2021
Effects of a Single Electrical Stimulation Session on Foot Force Production, Foot Dome Stability, and Dynamic
Romain Tourillon1,2, Hugo Bothorel3, Patrick O McKeon4
1UJM-Saint-Etienne Interuniversity Laboratory of Human Movement Biology, EA 7424, University of Lyon, France.
Context:
Mounting evidence suggests neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising modality for enhancing lower limb muscle strength, yet the functional effects of a single electrical stimulation session for improving the function of the intrinsic foot muscles (IFM) has not been evaluated.
Objective:
To investigate the immediate effects of an NMES session compared with a sham stimulation session on foot force production, foot dome stability, and dynamic postural control in participants with static foot pronation.
Design:
Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Setting:
Laboratory.
Patients Or Other Participants:
A total of 46 participants (23 males, 23 females) with static foot pronation according to their Foot Posture Index (score ≥ 6) were randomly assigned to an NMES (n = 23) or control (n = 23) group.
Intervention(S):
The NMES group received a single 15-minute NMES session on the dominant foot across the IFM. The control group received a 15-minute sham electrical stimulation session.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
All outcome measurements were assessed before and after the intervention and consisted of foot force production on a pressure platform, foot dome stability, and dynamic postural control. Statistical analysis was based on the responsiveness of the outcome measures and responder analysis using the minimum detectable change scores for each outcome measure.
Results:
In the NMES group, 78% of participants were classified as responders for at least 2 of the 3 outcomes, compared with only 22% in the control group. The relative risk of being a responder in the NMES group compared with the control group was 3.6 (95% CI = 1.6, 8.1]. Interestingly, we found that all participants who concomitantly responded to foot strength and navicular drop (n = 8) were also responders in dynamic postural control.
Conclusions:
Compared with a sham stimulation session, a single NMES session was effective in immediately improving foot function and dynamic postural control in participants with static foot pronation. These findings support the role of NMES for improving IFM function in this population.
