Frequency and Outcomes of Periprocedural MI in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI
Yasushi Ueki1, Tatsuhiko Otsuka1, Sarah Bär1
1Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Background:
Definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) differ with respect to biomarker threshold as well as ancillary criteria for myocardial ischemia and are limited in terms of validation.
Objectives:
This study evaluated the frequency and impact of periprocedural MI by using various MI definitions among patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
Between 2010 and 2018, periprocedural MIs were assessed according to the third and fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI), Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2), and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) criteria based on high-sensitivity troponin in patients with CCS undergoing PCI enrolled into the Bern PCI registry. The primary endpoint was cardiac death at 1 year.
Results:
Among 4,404 patients with CCS, periprocedural MI defined by the third UDMI, fourth UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI were observed in 18.0%, 14.9%, 2.0%, and 2.0% of patients, respectively. Among patients with periprocedural MI defined by the third UDMI, fourth UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI, cardiac mortality at 1 year was 2.9%, 3.0%, 5.8%, and 10.0%. The ARC-2 (HR: 3.90; 95% CI: 1.54-9.93) and SCAI (HR: 7.66; 95% CI: 3.64-16.11) were more relevant compared with the third UDMI (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.04-3.00) and fourth UDMI (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.11-3.37) for cardiac death at 1 year.
Conclusions:
Among patients with CCS undergoing PCI, periprocedural MI defined according to the ARC-2 and SCAI criteria was 7 to 9 times less frequent compared with the third and fourth UDMI. Periprocedural MI defined by using the ARC-2 and SCAI were more prognostic for cardiac death at 1 year compared with the third and fourth UDMI. (CARDIOBASE Bern PCI Registry; NCT02241291).
Insights
Different definitions for periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) impact patient outcomes. The Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2) and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) criteria are more prognostic for cardiac death than older Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) criteria.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- Definitions for periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) vary in biomarker thresholds and ischemia criteria, lacking robust validation.
- This variability complicates accurate assessment of MI frequency and its clinical impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of periprocedural MI using different definitions in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Bern PCI registry (2010-2018) for 4,404 patients with CCS undergoing PCI.
- Assessed periprocedural MI using the third and fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI), Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2), and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) criteria.
- Primary endpoint was 1-year cardiac death.
Main Results:
- Periprocedural MI rates varied: 18.0% (3rd UDMI), 14.9% (4th UDMI), 2.0% (ARC-2), and 2.0% (SCAI).
- One-year cardiac mortality was 2.9% (3rd UDMI), 3.0% (4th UDMI), 5.8% (ARC-2), and 10.0% (SCAI).
- ARC-2 and SCAI criteria demonstrated greater prognostic relevance for 1-year cardiac death compared to UDMI criteria.
Conclusions:
- ARC-2 and SCAI criteria identified periprocedural MI less frequently (7-9 times) than UDMI criteria in CCS patients undergoing PCI.
- Periprocedural MI identified by ARC-2 and SCAI criteria showed stronger prognostic value for 1-year cardiac death.
- The findings highlight the importance of using validated, contemporary MI definitions for accurate risk stratification.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
