Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How technology is reframing the abortion debate.

D Callahan

    The Hastings Center Report
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Fusion Energy Output Greater than the Kinetic Energy of an Imploding Shell at the National Ignition Facility.

    Physical review letters·2018
    Same author

    Indications of flow near maximum compression in layered deuterium-tritium implosions at the National Ignition Facility.

    Physical review. E·2016
    Same author

    Generation and Beaming of Early Hot Electrons onto the Capsule in Laser-Driven Ignition Hohlraums.

    Physical review letters·2016
    Same author

    First high-convergence cryogenic implosion in a near-vacuum hohlraum.

    Physical review letters·2015
    Same author

    Charged-particle spectroscopy for diagnosing shock ρR and strength in NIF implosions.

    The Review of scientific instruments·2012
    Same author

    Measurement of electron temperature of imploded capsules at the National Ignition Facility.

    The Review of scientific instruments·2012
    Same journal

    Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    See all related articles

    Medical advancements are increasing attention on fetal status, potentially influencing public opinion on abortion legality. However, current scientific and legal consensus does not undermine the reasoning behind Roe v. Wade, though moral discourse is encouraged.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Legal Medicine
    • Fetal Development

    Background:

    • The 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion has intensified focus on fetal status due to medical and scientific progress.
    • These advancements may shape legal, social, and moral perspectives, potentially impacting public opinion and challenging abortion legality.
    • Current medical data and legal interpretations have not yet converged to invalidate the rationale of Roe v. Wade.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the influence of medical and scientific developments on the legal and moral status of the fetus.
    • To assess the potential impact of these developments on public opinion and the legal standing of abortion.
    • To examine the relationship between scientific understanding, legal precedent, and the ongoing debate surrounding abortion.

    Main Methods:

    Keywords:
    Genetics and ReproductionRight to Life MovementRoe v. WadeAbortion LawAbortion, InducedAmericasAnti-abortion GroupsAttitudeBehaviorBeliefsCultureDecision MakingDelivery Of Health CareDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesEconomic FactorsEthicsFamily PlanningFertility Control, PostconceptionFetusHealthHealth ServicesInterest GroupsJurisprudenceMedicine--changesNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaOpposition To Family PlanningPhilosophical OverviewPolitical FactorsPsychological FactorsPublic OpinionSocial ChangeTechnology--changesUnited StatesWomen's Status

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Review of medical and scientific literature concerning fetal development and status.
    • Analysis of legal precedents and Supreme Court decisions related to abortion.
    • Examination of societal and ethical discourse surrounding abortion and fetal rights.

    Main Results:

    • Medical and scientific advancements have heightened attention on fetal status.
    • These developments have the potential to influence legal, social, and moral viewpoints.
    • No definitive convergence of medical data and legal opinion currently exists to undermine Roe v. Wade.

    Conclusions:

    • While scientific progress is significant, it has not yet provided grounds to overturn existing abortion law.
    • The prochoice movement should engage openly with moral questions to ensure abortion remains a legally accepted practice.
    • Continued dialogue is necessary to navigate the complex intersection of medical science, law, and ethics in abortion debates.