Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Insanity legislation.

Journal of Medical Ethics

|March 1, 1986

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The McNaughton Rules for insanity defense are outdated. Legal reforms are needed to prevent inappropriate imprisonment of mentally disordered individuals and address gaps in the Mental Health Act 1983.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Scanning laser-induced endothelial injury: a standardized and reproducible thrombosis model for intravital microscopy.

Scientific reports·2022

Same author

Investigation of anemia of unknown origin.

Immunohematology·2021

Same author

Inhibition of protease-activated receptor 4 impairs platelet procoagulant activity during thrombus formation in human blood.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2016

Same author

Fatal hemorrhage from simple lacerations of the scalp.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2015

Same author

Safety and efficacy of targeting platelet proteinase-activated receptors in combination with existing anti-platelet drugs as antithrombotics in mice.

British journal of pharmacology·2012

Same author

Transgenic, inducible RNAi in megakaryocytes and platelets in mice.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2010

Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Legal Psychology
Criminal Law

Background:

The McNaughton Rules, a legal standard for the insanity defense in homicide cases, are critically examined.
Current legal frameworks are identified as outdated and inadequate for contemporary justice.
The historical principle of excusing individuals with severe mental disorders from criminal responsibility is discussed.

Observation:

The existing insanity defense is deemed unsatisfactory and requires reformulation.
There is a growing preference for a diminished responsibility defense, potentially undermining the principle of excusing the severely mentally disordered.
The Mental Health Act 1983 has not adequately addressed rare cases, such as epilepsy, where an offender may be legally insane but not classified as mentally disordered.

Findings:

Related Experiment Videos

The McNaughton Rules are no longer fit for purpose in assessing criminal responsibility.
Reform is necessary to ensure justice for both the mentally disordered and society.
Current legislation fails to account for specific scenarios of legal insanity outside typical mental disorder classifications.

Implications:

Parliamentary review of the insanity defense and related legislation is urgently required.
Inappropriate incarceration of mentally disordered offenders must be prevented.
Legal and psychiatric definitions of insanity and mental disorder require updated consideration within the criminal justice system.