Primary and adjunctive intra-arterial digital subtraction arteriography of the lower extremities

Standard contrast arteriography (SCA) and intra-arterial digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) were performed during a 26-month period in 459 cases. The DSA group consisted of 22 aortoiliac studies, 66 crural-pedal arch studies, and 227 combinations. In addition, postoperative DSA was performed in 42 patients to evaluate graft patency, morphology, and inflow and runoff circulations. There were no significant differences in the quality of the preoperative aortoiliac studies performed by either SCA or DSA although, in select cases, one or the other of these techniques resulted in a superior study. Distal crural-pedal arch visualization was enhanced with DSA compared with SCA (85% vs. 65%) but when both were compared with their corresponding intraoperative completion arteriograms, the interpretive error rates resulted in comparable accuracies, false positive and negative rates, and predictive values. The likelihood of achieving graft patency in patients who have unsatisfactory preoperative visualization of the distal circulation by DSA is reasonable (11 of 27 patients) but inferior to the number obtained when there is adequate DSA visualization (40 of 53 patients). We conclude that DSA is a valuable adjunct to preoperative SCA but should not be used as the sole criterion for the assessment of operability for limb salvage. Intraoperative prereconstruction arteriography or direct surgical exploration of the crural arteries in patients with inadequate preoperative visualization will result in graft patency in a significant percentage of cases. Intra-arterial DSA for postoperative evaluation of lower limb bypass adds another dimension to analysis of graft structure and status of the host circulatory beds and also provides a method for accurate interpretation of postoperative data.