Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
Published on: July 19, 2021
The case against COVID-19 vaccine mandates in pediatric solid organ transplantation
Lainie Friedman Ross1,2,3, Douglas J Opel4,5
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Insights
Mandating COVID-19 vaccination for pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and their households is not ethically justifiable. The potential harm of denying transplantation outweighs the risks associated with remaining unvaccinated.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Ethics
- Transplant Medicine
- Infectious Disease Control
Background:
- Joint statements recommend COVID-19 vaccination for solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and close contacts.
- Some SOT programs mandate vaccination for listing and transplantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To ethically evaluate the justification for mandating COVID-19 vaccination in pediatric SOT candidates.
- To assess the ethical implications of vaccine mandates for SOT candidates, their support persons, and households.
Main Methods:
- Utilized current best evidence and moral theory.
- Examined ethical justifications for vaccine mandates in pediatric populations.
- Applied principles to the SOT context, considering disease prevention and resource stewardship.
Main Results:
- Vaccine mandates are justifiable for serious vaccine-preventable diseases with high transmission and no less intrusive alternatives.
- Stewardship of scarce transplant resources can justify mandates if graft loss is a significant risk.
- Current evidence does not support these criteria for pediatric SOT and COVID-19 vaccination.
Conclusions:
- Contingent listing on COVID-19 vaccination for pediatric SOT candidates is ethically problematic.
- The risk of harm from not being listed for transplantation outweighs the risks of remaining unvaccinated.
Background:
The American Society of Transplantation in conjunction with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation released a joint statement on August 13, 2021 in which they strongly recommend that solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and their eligible household members and close contacts be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 with an approved COVID-19 vaccine. Some SOT programs have gone further and will refuse to list or transplant candidates unless the candidate and their household are vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.
Methods:
Two general pediatrician-ethicists use current best evidence and moral theory to argue why it is unethical to mandate COVID-19 vaccination for pediatric SOT candidates, their primary support person, and their households.
Results:
Pediatric vaccine mandates are most justifiable when they prevent the harm of a serious vaccine preventable disease (VPD) in children in settings where transmission is highly likely and there are no alternatives that are effective in preventing transmission that intrude less on individual freedom. An additional justification for a vaccine mandate in the SOT context is stewardship of a scarce resource if there is significant risk of graft loss from the VPD to an unvaccinated SOT candidate or recipient. Current evidence does not support fulfillment of these criteria in pediatric solid organ transplantation.
Conclusions:
Making SOT listing contingent on COVID-19 vaccination is problematic. Though there is some risk of harm to a pediatric SOT candidate in remaining unvaccinated, the risk of harm of not being listed and transplanted is greater and overriding.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Vaccinations
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution

