Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025
An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain PPOP
Published on: January 27, 2010
The association between acute lower abdominal pain over a previous caesarean scar and uterine rupture
Maya Frank Wolf1,2, Maayan Ben-Nun2, Inshirah Sgayer1,2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel.
Pregnant women with previous caesarean delivery might suffer from acute lower abdominal pain located at the site of previous caesarean scar (CS). The association between this complaint and uterine rupture (UR) is not fully understood. Therefore, we aimed to examine the risk of UR in women with acute persistent abdominal pain (APAP) over a previous CS and to investigate all the women with UR, with or without APAP and with or without previous CS, in order to determine risk factors, clinical presentation and management. We performed a retrospective analysis on two study groups: women who had APAP over previous CS and women who had UR. We found an incidence of UR in patients with APAP over the previous CS was 0.7%; which doubled the total UR rate among women with previous caesarean in our medical centre (0.35%). Forty percent of the women with APAP over a previous CS had preterm delivery. Twenty percent of the cases of UR occurred in preterm weeks. To conclude, APAP over a previous CS is associated with a doubled risk of UR. Considering this symptom as a preliminary sign of UR might lead to elevated rate of iatrogenic preterm deliveries.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Women with UR may present with abdominal pain which may vary from non-specific mild discomfort to severe acute abdominal pain. Additionally, these women may suffer from acute persistent abdominal pain (APAP) located over the previous caesarean scar. The clinical significance of APAP in these women has not been fully investigated.What do the results of this study add? Lower abdominal pain located at the site of previous CS is associated with a doubled risk of UR. Considering this complaint as a major sign of UR might lead to an elevated rate of iatrogenic preterm deliveries.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Further studies are needed to explore whether women with a single complaint of APAP over CS could be managed expectantly and even offered a trial of labour after caesarean delivery (CD).
Pregnant women with previous caesarean delivery might suffer from acute lower abdominal pain located at the site of previous caesarean scar (CS). The association between this complaint and uterine rupture (UR) is not fully understood. Therefore, we aimed to examine the risk of UR in women with acute persistent abdominal pain (APAP) over a previous CS and to investigate all the women with UR, with or without APAP and with or without previous CS, in order to determine risk factors, clinical presentation and management. We performed a retrospective analysis on two study groups: women who had APAP over previous CS and women who had UR. We found an incidence of UR in patients with APAP over the previous CS was 0.7%; which doubled the total UR rate among women with previous caesarean in our medical centre (0.35%). Forty percent of the women with APAP over a previous CS had preterm delivery. Twenty percent of the cases of UR occurred in preterm weeks. To conclude, APAP over a previous CS is associated with a doubled risk of UR. Considering this symptom as a preliminary sign of UR might lead to elevated rate of iatrogenic preterm deliveries.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Women with UR may present with abdominal pain which may vary from non-specific mild discomfort to severe acute abdominal pain. Additionally, these women may suffer from acute persistent abdominal pain (APAP) located over the previous caesarean scar. The clinical significance of APAP in these women has not been fully investigated.What do the results of this study add? Lower abdominal pain located at the site of previous CS is associated with a doubled risk of UR. Considering this complaint as a major sign of UR might lead to an elevated rate of iatrogenic preterm deliveries.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Further studies are needed to explore whether women with a single complaint of APAP over CS could be managed expectantly and even offered a trial of labour after caesarean delivery (CD).
More Related Videos
04:08Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Published on: June 27, 2025
07:20Intraoperative Detection of Subtle Endometriosis: A Novel Paradigm for Detection and Treatment of Pelvic Pain Associated with the Loss of Peritoneal Integrity
Published on: December 21, 2012
Related Concept Videos
01:22Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
01:19Abdominal Regions and Quadrants
The simpler quadrants approach, which is more commonly used in medicine, subdivides the cavity with one horizontal and one vertical line that intersects at the patient's umbilicus (navel). The four...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
01:21Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
01:26Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
01:30Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management