Post-Fellowship Foot and Ankle Surgeon Research Productivity: A Systematic Review

Though foot and ankle surgery fellowships have been around for decades, contributing factors for long-term research productivity remain unreported. Along with enhancing surgical training, the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) tasked programs with fostering research in effort to continue post-fellowship investigations. As the number of fellowship programs and fellows continues to increase, this study attempts to identifies factors associated with postfellowship research success. A PubMed search of peer-reviewed literature authored by ACFAS recognized 1-year fellowship graduates from 2000-2018 was conducted. Demographic data including current practice type and location was collected. Research activity at the 3, 5, and 10-year postfellowship period was investigated between publication history and current practice type. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ .05. Among the 37 fellowships assessed, 132 fellows were eligible for analysis. Most fellows maintained hospital-based employment 46 (34%) followed by private 44 (33%) and orthopedic group 30 (22%) practices. The proportion of fellows that published 5 and 10 years postfellowship was associated with research productivity 3 and 5 years postfellowship (p ≤ .03). The odds of publishing 3 years post-fellowship in orthopedic groups and university-based practices were 1.62 and 4.42 times higher compared to hospital-based graduates, respectively. The odds of publishing 5 years post-fellowship in orthopedic group and university based practices were 3.5 and 6.63 times higher than hospital-based practices, respectively. Despite the growing number of fellowships, a small proportion of fellows continue publishing postfellowship. These findings support the need to provide resources to engage graduates if retaining young practitioners in scholarly activity is desired.