Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

967
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
967
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.1K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

5.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
5.7K
Bernoulli's Equation: Problem Solving01:16

Bernoulli's Equation: Problem Solving

1.5K
A Venturi meter is essential for measuring fluid flow rates in pipelines. It utilizes the relationship between fluid velocity and pressure described by Bernoulli's equation. When installed in a sewage system, the Venturi meter accurately determines the wastewater flow rate by measuring pressure differences.
The first step is to compute the cross-sectional areas of the pipe and the Venturi throat to analyze the pressure difference indicated by the pressure gauge. Next, the continuity...
1.5K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

137
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
137

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inverse Statistics of Active Matter Trajectories to Distinguish Interaction Kernel Anisotropy from Emergent Correlations.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

A likelihood-based Bayesian inference framework for the calibration of and selection between stochastic velocity-jump models.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

The influence of cell phenotype on collective cell invasion into the extracellular matrix.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2025
Same author

Inference and prediction for stochastic models of biological populations undergoing migration and proliferation.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2025
Same author

Identification of neural crest and melanoma cancer cell invasion and migration genes using high-throughput screening and deep attention networks.

Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists·2025
Same author

Modularity of the segmentation clock and morphogenesis.

eLife·2025
Same journal

Computational modelling distinguishes diverse contributors to aneurysmal progression in the Marfan aorta.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2025
Same journal

Inferring the shape of data: a probabilistic framework for analysing experiments in the natural sciences.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2023
Same journal

The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. I. Linear theory.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

Soft wetting with (a)symmetric Shuttleworth effect.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

The quantum theory of time: a calculus for q-numbers.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

Integrable nonlinear evolution equations in three spatial dimensions.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
07:42

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis

Published on: February 7, 2025

326

Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning.

Simon Martina-Perez1, Matthew J Simpson2, Ruth E Baker1

  • 1Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Proceedings. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|February 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Learning differential equations from noisy data reveals significant model variations. Utilizing multiple datasets with Bayesian inference quantifies uncertainty and identifies mechanistic insights in complex systems.

Keywords:
equation learningmathematical modellinguncertainty quantification

More Related Videos

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
09:23

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

Published on: August 16, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
07:42

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis

Published on: February 7, 2025

326
Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
09:23

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

Published on: August 16, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Science
  • Systems Biology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Equation learning infers differential equation models from observational data.
  • Previous studies focused on noise-free or low-noise data for accurate model identification.
  • The impact of observation noise on the uncertainty of learned differential equation models is largely unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between observation noise and uncertainty in learned differential equation models.
  • To develop methods for quantifying uncertainty in equation learning using multiple datasets.
  • To draw mechanistic conclusions about underlying differential equations from noisy data.

Main Methods:

  • Employed equation learning techniques combined with Bayesian inference.
  • Utilized simulation data from an agent-based model (ABM) with a known partial differential equation description.
  • Applied Bayesian inference to obtain posterior parameter distributions for uncertainty quantification.

Main Results:

  • Noisy datasets lead to substantial variations in both the structure and parameter values of learned differential equation models.
  • The proposed approach effectively quantifies uncertainty in learned models by leveraging multiple datasets.
  • Demonstrated the ability to extract mechanistic insights into the target differential equations.

Conclusions:

  • Observation noise significantly impacts the reliability of differential equation models learned from data.
  • Combining multiple datasets with Bayesian inference provides a robust framework for uncertainty quantification in equation learning.
  • This methodology enables more reliable model discovery and mechanistic understanding from complex, noisy data.