Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microcracking in Concrete01:20

Microcracking in Concrete

229
Microcracking in concrete refers to the tiny cracks that can form within the material even before any external load is applied. These microcracks typically occur at the interface between the coarse aggregate and the hydrated cement paste, often as a result of differential volume changes prompted by variations in stress-strain behavior, as well as thermal and moisture movement. Initially, these microcracks remain stable and do not grow substantially until the concrete is stressed to about 30...
229

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Displacement Sensing Using Bimodal Resonance in Over-Coupled Inductors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

A Multivariate Statistical Approach to Wrinkling Detection in Composites.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2024
Same author

Finite element modelling strategy for determining directivity of thermoelastically generated laser ultrasound.

Ultrasonics·2024
Same author

Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Ultrasonic Defect Sizing.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2023
Same author

Exploring the potential of using simulation games for engaging with sheep farmers about lameness recognition.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2023
Same author

Suppression of front and back surface reflections in ultrasonic analytic-signal responses from composites.

Ultrasonics·2022
Same journal

Theoretical Foundations of the Echo Envelope Statistical Modeling: A Tutorial.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Practical Demonstrations of FR3-Band Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Acoustic Filter Design.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Real-Time Heterogeneous Helical Wave Spectrum Method for Transabdominal Passive Acoustic Mapping.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Cascaded Plane Wave Ultrasound Velocity Vector Imaging: In Vivo Feasibility in Carotid Arteries.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Quantitative Acoustic Attenuation Scanning Using a Phase-Insensitive Ultrasound Computed Tomography System.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

FPGA-Accelerated CNN Reconstruction for Low-Power Sparse-Array Ultrasound Imaging.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation
05:30

Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation

Published on: September 29, 2019

8.4K

Domain Adapted Deep-Learning for Improved Ultrasonic Crack Characterization Using Limited Experimental Data.

Richard J Pyle, Rhodri L T Bevan, Robert R Hughes

    IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
    |February 14, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Domain adaptation improves deep learning for ultrasonic crack characterization. Adversarial domain adaptation significantly reduces sizing errors, even with limited experimental data, outperforming traditional methods.

    More Related Videos

    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode
    06:54

    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode

    Published on: March 7, 2018

    10.8K
    Induction of Adhesion-dependent Signals Using Low-intensity Ultrasound
    08:51

    Induction of Adhesion-dependent Signals Using Low-intensity Ultrasound

    Published on: May 8, 2012

    9.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

    Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation
    05:30

    Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation

    Published on: September 29, 2019

    8.4K
    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode
    06:54

    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode

    Published on: March 7, 2018

    10.8K
    Induction of Adhesion-dependent Signals Using Low-intensity Ultrasound
    08:51

    Induction of Adhesion-dependent Signals Using Low-intensity Ultrasound

    Published on: May 8, 2012

    9.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Materials Science
    • Non-Destructive Evaluation
    • Artificial Intelligence

    Background:

    • Deep learning offers automated and accurate ultrasonic crack characterization.
    • Simulating data is crucial for nondestructive evaluation (NDE) but introduces discrepancies between simulated and real-world data.
    • Applying models trained on simulated data to experimental data leads to inaccuracies due to distribution shifts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the challenge of applying deep learning models trained on simulated ultrasonic data to experimental measurements.
    • To investigate the effectiveness of domain adaptation (DA) techniques in improving crack characterization accuracy.
    • To evaluate different DA methods for sizing surface-breaking defects in in-line pipe inspection using a convolutional neural network (CNN).

    Main Methods:

    • A CNN was employed for predicting the depth of surface-breaking defects.
    • Three domain adaptation methods were compared against two non-DA baseline methods.
    • Performance was evaluated by sizing 15 experimental notches with varying lengths (1-5 mm) and angles (up to 20°).
    • Experimental training sets were incrementally built from 1 to 15 notches.

    Main Results:

    • The adversarial domain adaptation method demonstrated superior performance in utilizing limited experimental data.
    • With only three experimental notches, the adversarial DA method achieved a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.5 ± 0.037 mm.
    • In contrast, methods using only experimental data yielded an RMSE of 1.5 ± 0.13 mm, and methods using only simulated data resulted in an RMSE of 0.64 ± 0.044 mm.

    Conclusions:

    • Adversarial domain adaptation is highly effective for ultrasonic crack characterization with limited experimental data.
    • DA significantly enhances the accuracy of deep learning models in NDE applications, bridging the gap between simulated and experimental data.
    • This approach offers a robust solution for accurate defect sizing in real-world inspection scenarios.