Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Modelling transitions between egalitarian, dynamic leader and absolutist power structures
John Bryden1,2, Eric Silverman3, Simon T Powers4
1School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Human groups show a variety of leadership dynamics ranging from egalitarian groups with no leader, to groups with changing leaders, to absolutist groups with a single long-term leader. Here, we model transitions between these different phases of leadership dynamics, investigating the role of inequalities in relationships between individuals. Our results demonstrate a novel riches-to-rags class of leadership dynamics where a leader can be replaced by a new individual. We note that the transition between the three different phases of leadership dynamics resembles transitions in leadership dynamics during the Neolithic period of human history. We argue how technological developments, such as food storage and/or weapons which allow one individual to control large quantities of resources, would mean that relationships became more unequal. In general terms, we provide a model of how individual relationships can affect leadership dynamics and structures.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Role-Based Identity
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Impact of Groups on Groups
Impact of Individuals on a Group

