Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about the way you...
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Bullying02:04

Bullying

A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication01:30

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Things we know about media and morality.

Nature human behaviour·2019
Same author

Evaluating Health Advice in a Web 2.0 Environment: The Impact of Multiple User-Generated Factors on HIV Advice Perceptions.

Health communication·2016
Same author

Media Effects: Theory and Research.

Annual review of psychology·2015
Same author

Supporting tobacco control: stimulating local newspaper coverage with a technical assistance website for local coalitions.

Health promotion practice·2011
Same author

Continued benefits of a technical assistance web site to local tobacco control coalitions during a state budget shortfall.

Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP·2011
Same author

Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the Internet: Web sites versus discussion groups.

Health communication·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

Social media and online hate.

Joseph B Walther1

  • 1Dept. of Communication/Center for Information Technology and Society, University of California at Santa Barbara, USA.

Current Opinion in Psychology
|February 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Online hate messages are driven by social approval, not just individual traits. Individuals create hateful content to gain rewards like friendship and social support from peers, reinforcing their prejudices.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Online Communication
  • Hate Speech Analysis

Background:

  • Social media platforms exhibit high levels of hate messages, posing risks to individuals and groups.
  • Traditional research on online hate focuses on perpetrator characteristics, overlooking social dynamics.
  • Existing approaches fail to account for the role of social approval and peer dynamics in perpetuating online animosity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and support a social approval-based theory of online hate.
  • To investigate how social media dynamics influence the generation of hate messages.
  • To explore the role of peer reward and social support in reinforcing prejudice.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis integrating social psychology principles with online behavior.
Keywords:
Approval-seekingOnline hatePeer supportRacismSocial media

More Related Videos

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling
07:35

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling

Published on: March 3, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling
07:35

How Virtual Celebrity Characteristics Drive Purchase Intention: Testing the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework with Structural Equation Modeling

Published on: March 3, 2026

  • Review of recent research on related phenomena such as moral grandstanding and political derision.
  • Examination of how social media facilitates peer-based validation for antagonistic behavior.
  • Main Results:

    • Online hate can be understood as a mechanism for gaining social rewards and approval from like-minded individuals.
    • Antagonism towards mutually disliked targets serves as a basis for forming social bonds and receiving peer support.
    • This process enhances perpetrators' well-being and simultaneously deepens their existing prejudices.

    Conclusions:

    • A social approval framework offers a novel perspective on understanding and addressing online hate.
    • Interventions should consider the social and interpersonal motivators driving hate speech on social media.
    • Future research should further explore the interplay between social dynamics and prejudice reinforcement in online environments.