Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation01:22

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation

The instrumentation of atomic emission spectrometry (AES) involves various components, including atomization devices that convert samples into gas-phase atoms and ions. There are two main types of atomization devices: continuous and discrete atomizers.  Continuous atomizers, like plasmas and flames, introduce samples in a constant stream, while discrete atomizers inject individual samples using syringes or autosamplers. The most common discrete atomizer is the electrothermal atomizer.
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference01:30

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference

In atomic emission spectroscopy (AES), high-temperature atomizers excite a broad range of elements and molecules that generate complex emissions from sources such as oxides, hydroxides, and flame combustion products in the flame or plasma. Several strategies can be employed to minimize spectral interferences caused by overlapping emission lines or bands. These include increasing instrument resolution, choosing alternative emission lines, optimally placing the detector in low-background regions,...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab01:29

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab

AES is a powerful analytical technique, especially effective when used with plasma sources, producing abundant spectra in characteristic emission lines. The Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP), in particular, yields superior quantitative analytical data due to its high stability, low noise, low background, and minimal interferences under optimal experimental conditions. However, newer air-operated microwave sources are emerging as promising alternatives that could be more cost-effective than...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data-driven insights into the performance of scalable magnetic clay-based composites for pollutant removal.

RSC advances·2026
Same author

Particle emission rates and conditions of use for the cutting of biobased composite polyurethane foam.

Open research Europe·2026
Same author

How credible is REACH regulation without transparency, quality criteria, assurance, and control?

Open research Europe·2026
Same author

Methods and tools for the safety assessment part of the European Commission's safe and sustainable by design framework when applied to advanced materials.

Environment international·2025
Same author

Application of in vitro pulmonary models for hazard screening of silica particles.

Archives of toxicology·2025
Same author

Hybrid materials for wastewater treatment: synergistic coupling of <i>Neochloris oleoabundans</i> and TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles.

Nanoscale advances·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering
07:47

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

7.5K

Particles Emission from an Industrial Spray Coating Process Using Nano-Materials.

Benedetta Del Secco1, Sara Trabucco1, Fabrizio Ravegnani1

  • 1CNR-ISAC, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate-National Research Council of Italy, Via Gobetti, 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 15, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Industrial spray coating releases ultrafine particles (UFPs), posing worker exposure risks. This study monitored titanium dioxide (TiO2-N) and silver (AgHEC) nanoparticle releases during spray coating, finding TiO2-N generated higher concentrations.

Keywords:
aerosolnanoparticlesspray coatingworker exposure

More Related Videos

A System to Create Stable Nanoparticle Aerosols from Nanopowders
12:59

A System to Create Stable Nanoparticle Aerosols from Nanopowders

Published on: July 26, 2016

9.7K
Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process
08:33

Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process

Published on: May 30, 2017

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering
07:47

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

7.5K
A System to Create Stable Nanoparticle Aerosols from Nanopowders
12:59

A System to Create Stable Nanoparticle Aerosols from Nanopowders

Published on: July 26, 2016

9.7K
Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process
08:33

Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process

Published on: May 30, 2017

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Nanotechnology
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Industrial spray coating is widely used for large surfaces but can be a significant source of worker exposure to ultrafine particles (UFPs).
  • Characterizing nanoparticle release during these processes is crucial for assessing and mitigating potential health risks.
  • Titanium dioxide (TiO2-N) and silver (AgHEC) nanoparticles are commonly used in coatings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify and characterize the release of TiO2-N and AgHEC nanoparticles during industrial spray coating of PMMA and polyester.
  • To assess worker exposure levels to these nanoparticles at different locations within the spray chamber.
  • To compare nanoparticle release concentrations with established nano reference values (NRVs).

Main Methods:

  • A monitoring campaign was conducted at an industrial spray-coating facility.
  • On-line and off-line instruments were used to characterize aerosol particles inside the spray chamber at near field (NF) and far field (FF) locations.
  • Measurements focused on particle number and mass concentrations across various size ranges.

Main Results:

  • TiO2-N suspensions generated higher particle number concentrations (0.3-1 µm) than AgHEC suspensions (1.9x10^2 p/cm³ vs 2.5x10¹ p/cm³).
  • At worst-case scenarios for TiO2-N, spray spikes at FF correlated with NF, with a 1-minute time lag indicating a diffusion speed of 0.1 m/s.
  • Averaged mass concentration ratios of NF to the spray chamber were 1.7% for TiO2-N and 1.5% for AgHEC.
  • Particle number concentrations for TiO2-N (0.3-1 µm) were similar for PMMA and polyester substrates.
  • Aerosol number concentrations at NF for both suspensions were below NRVs (16x10³ p/cm⁻³).

Conclusions:

  • Industrial spray coating processes release UFPs, with TiO2-N suspensions showing higher emission rates than AgHEC.
  • Worker exposure to nanoparticles can be significant, particularly under high-flow conditions, necessitating exposure control measures.
  • While measured concentrations were below NRVs, continuous monitoring and risk assessment are vital for occupational safety in spray coating operations.