Comparison of crosswalk methods for translating ICD-9 to ICD-10 diagnosis codes for child maltreatment

Kathleen A Noorbakhsh1, Rachel P Berger2, Sriram Ramgopal3

  • 1Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, United States.

Child Abuse & Neglect
|February 15, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Developing reliable International Classification of Disease (ICD) 10th revision codes for child maltreatment is crucial. Current conversion methods are inconsistent, necessitating new, validated ICD-10 definitions for accurate research and surveillance.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Medical Informatics
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • A validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) 10th revision (ICD-10) code set for identifying child maltreatment is currently unavailable.
  • Such a code set is essential for administrative data-based research and public health surveillance of child maltreatment.
  • Existing research relies on ICD 9th edition, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, necessitating a transition to ICD-10-CM.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of child maltreatment diagnosis code classifications after conversion from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM.
  • To assess the effectiveness of General Equivalence Mappings (GEMs) and network-based mappings for this transition.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two large, multicenter hospital-based datasets (PHIS and KID) containing children with ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for child maltreatment.
  • Evaluated the performance of GEMs and network-based mappings using previously validated ICD-9-CM codes and their resulting ICD-10-CM codes across different time periods.
  • Compared the proportion of children diagnosed with specific maltreatment codes in the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 eras.

Main Results:

  • General Equivalence Mappings (GEMs) identified a limited number of comparable diagnoses (15 in KID, 14 in PHIS).
  • Network-based mapping identified more comparable diagnoses (18 in KID, 13 in PHIS), but showed significant discrepancies for some codes.
  • For six diagnoses, network-based mapping in the ICD-10 era resulted in proportions over ten times higher than in the ICD-9-CM era.

Conclusions:

  • Neither GEMs nor network-based mapping provided consistently reliable conversions between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM for child maltreatment codes.
  • Methodological limitations of crosswalks and inherent changes in ICD-10-CM contribute to conversion inaccuracies.
  • There is a critical need to independently develop and validate ICD-10-based definitions for child maltreatment to support future research and surveillance efforts.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)01:27

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) serves as the primary classification system for mental health disorders, providing standardized diagnostic criteria for clinicians and researchers. First published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952, the DSM has undergone several revisions to reflect evolving psychiatric understanding. The fifth edition, DSM-5, released in 2013, introduced key updates that expanded diagnostic categories and modified diagnostic...
253
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
2.6K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
650
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.2K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
3.1K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K