Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Can Concomitant Bladder Neck Incision and Primary Valve Ablation Reduce Early Re-admission Rate and Secondary
Ahmed Abdelhalim1, Abdelwahab Hashem1,2,3, Ebrahim E Abouelenein1
1Department of Pediatric Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Insights
Bladder neck incision (BNI) during posterior urethral valve ablation (PVA) does not lower early reintervention rates in infants with high bladder necks. This study found no significant difference in reintervention rates among different surgical approaches for posterior urethral valve (PUV).
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Surgical Innovation
- Congenital Anomalies
Background:
- Posterior urethral valve (PUV) is a common cause of bladder outlet obstruction in male infants.
- Management of PUV often involves ablation (PVA), but reintervention rates can be high, particularly with associated bladder neck abnormalities.
- The role of bladder neck incision (BNI) in conjunction with PVA for high bladder neck morphology in PUV patients remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of bladder neck morphology and the addition of bladder neck incision (BNI) to posterior urethral valve ablation (PVA) on the early reintervention rate.
- To compare reintervention rates in infants with PUV undergoing PVA with different bladder neck management strategies.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 114 infants undergoing PVA before 24 months of age with at least 18 months follow-up.
- Patients were categorized into three groups: normal bladder neck (PVA only), high bladder neck (PVA + BNI), and high bladder neck (PVA only).
- Early reintervention was defined as interventions within six months post-PVA due to persistent renal deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis, or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in the overall re-admission (p=0.65) or re-intervention (p=0.50) rates among the three groups.
- Specific reintervention rates were: Group 1 (normal bladder neck): 15.7%, Group 2 (high bladder neck + BNI): 14.3%, and Group 3 (high bladder neck only): 13.0%.
- The addition of BNI to PVA in patients with high bladder neck morphology did not statistically reduce the need for early reintervention.
Conclusions:
- Concomitant bladder neck incision (BNI) with posterior urethral valve ablation (PVA) does not decrease the early reintervention rate in patients with a morphologically high bladder neck.
- The current findings suggest that surgical strategy for the bladder neck in PUV patients may not significantly impact early reintervention outcomes.
- Further research may be warranted to explore other factors influencing reintervention rates in PUV management.
Objective:
To assess the effect of bladder neck morphology and its incision (BNI) in patients with posterior urethral valve (PUV) on early reintervention rate.
Patients And Methods:
Infants undergoing PUV ablation (PVA) before 24 months of age and had at least 18 months of follow-up, were categorized into three groups according to the bladder neck appearance on baseline radiological and endoscopic examination: group 1; normal bladder neck underwent PVA, group 2; high bladder neck underwent PVA plus BNI, group 3; high bladder neck underwent PVA only. Early reintervention was defined as the need for check cystoscopy because of persistent renal function deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis and/or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement during the 1st six months post primary PVA.
Results:
Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 114 patients underwent PVA and met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 58 (18-230) months. For group 1, 16 (22.9%) patients needed readmission. Check cystoscopy was free and no further intervention was performed in 5(7.5%) and re-ablation was performed in 11(15.7%) patients. For group 2, 3(14.3%) patients needed reintervention. Re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed in 1(4.8%) and 2(9.5%), respectively. For group 3, cystoscopy was free in 1(4.3%), re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed 2(8.7%) and 1(4.3%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the re-admission and re-intervention rates among the three study groups (p=0.65 and p=0.50, respectively).
Conclusion:
In morphologically high bladder neck associated PUV, concomitant BNI with PVA doesn't reduce early re-intervention rate.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

