Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Understanding income-related differences in distribution of child growth, behaviour and development using a
Anne Fuller1,2,3, Arjumand Siddiqi4,5, Faraz V Shahidi4,6
1Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada anne.fuller@sickkids.ca.
Insights
Children from low-income households face higher risks in health and development. Addressing income-related disparities in child health outcomes is crucial for targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Health Equity
Background:
- Children from low-income households experience increased risks for social, behavioral, and physical health issues.
- Previous research often used limited outcome measures, potentially overlooking inequities across the full distribution of health indicators.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in the distribution of child health outcomes (body mass index, behavior, development) between high- and low-income groups.
- To analyze how income influences the entire spectrum of child health indicators, not just extreme outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study utilizing data from a Canadian primary care research network.
- Compared distributions of body mass index z-score, behavior difficulties (SDQ), and development (ITC) between income groups using distributional decomposition.
- Constructed counterfactual distributions to estimate outcomes for low-income children if they had the characteristics of higher-income children.
Main Results:
- Children with lower family incomes exhibited a higher risk distribution across all three health outcomes.
- The counterfactual distributions for low-income children were more favorable than their observed distributions, indicating potential for improvement.
- Significant differences in the distribution of BMI, behavior, and development were observed between income groups.
Conclusions:
- Comparing outcome distributions provides a more nuanced understanding of child health inequities linked to socioeconomic status.
- These distributional methods can inform the development of targeted interventions to mitigate health disparities in children.
- Understanding the full range of health outcome distributions is essential for addressing child health inequities effectively.
Objectives:
Children from low-income households are at an increased risk of social, behavioural and physical health problems. Prior studies have generally relied on dichotomous outcome measures. However, inequities may exist along the range of outcome distribution. Our objective was to examine differences in distribution of three child health outcomes by income categories (high vs low): body mass index (BMI), behaviour difficulties and development.
Design And Setting:
This was a cross-sectional study using data from a primary care-based research network with sites in three Canadian cities, and 15 practices enrolling participants.
Participants, Independent Variable And Outcomes:
The independent variable was annual household income, dichotomised at the median income for Toronto (<$C80 000 or ≥$C80 000). Outcomes were: (1) growth (BMI z-score (zBMI) at 5 years, 1628 participants); (2) behaviour (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at 3-5 years, 649 participants); (3) development (Infant Toddler Checklist (ITC) at 18 months, 1405 participants). We used distributional decomposition to compare distributions of these outcomes for each income group, and then to construct a counterfactual distribution that describes the hypothetical distribution of the low-income group with the predictor profile of the higher-income group.
Results:
We included data from 1628 (zBMI), 649 (SDQ) and 1405 (ITC) children. Children with lower family income had a higher risk distribution for all outcomes. For all outcomes, thecounterfactual distribution, which represented the distribution of children with lower-income who were assigned the predictor profile of the higher-income group, was more favourable than their observed distributions.
Conclusion:
Comparing the distributions of child health outcomes and understanding different risk profiles for children from higher-income and lower-income groups can offer a deeper understanding of inequities in child health outcomes. These methods may offer an approach that can be implemented in larger datasets to inform future interventions.
More Related Videos
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Nature and Nurture
Longitudinal Studies
Regression Toward the Mean
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Longitudinal Research