Clinical outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing pacemaker: 3-year follow-up

Left ventricular function can be affected by chronic ventricular pacing. Different right ventricular (RV) pacing sites have shown heterogeneous clinical outcomes. We investigated these factors in patients receiving permanent pacemaker (PPM) implants.

This multicenter, retrospective analysis of PPM use in South Korea, included all patients undergoing de novo transvenous PPM implantation for atrioventricular block from 2017 to 2019. Clinical characteristics, 12-lead electrocardiograms, echocardiography, and laboratory parameters were evaluated. Composite outcomes are defined by two coprimary endpoints: (1) hospitalizations and (2) cardiac death by heart failure during follow-up period.

There were 167 patients (66 males; overall mean age 75.3 ± 11.9 years), divided into two groups according to the pacing site: 83 apical RV (RVA) vs. 84 septal RV (RVS). There were no significant baseline differences. Paced QRS duration (pQRSd) increased with RVA (168.5 ± 20.1 vs. 159.1 ± 16.3 ms; p < 0.001). Over a median 31-month follow-up, there were 15 hospitalizations and 2 deaths. More patients with RVA were hospitalized or died (16% vs. 5%, respectively; p = 0.049). In Cox proportional regression analysis, pQRSd (hazard ratio [HR] 1.046; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.004-1.091; p = 0.033), and diastolic dysfunction (HR 7.343; 95% CI 2.035-26.494; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of composite clinical outcomes.

RVS placement shortened the pQRSd and improved clinical outcomes. However, the determinants of these were pQRSd and diastolic dysfunction. Therefore, clinicians should try to shorten the pQRSd when implanting a PPM, and patients with diastolic dysfunction should be monitored intensively.