Fistulotomy versus standard cannulation as the primary technique for all patients undergoing ERCP with a native

Lawrence Hookey1, Mandip Rai1, Robert Bechara2

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Trials
|February 17, 2022
PubMed

Insights

This study will compare the needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) technique to standard cannulation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The goal is to determine if NKF reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopy
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is a significant risk following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
  • Difficulty in achieving biliary access is a known risk factor for PEP.
  • The needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) technique offers a novel approach to biliary access, potentially minimizing thermal damage and PEP risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of initial NKF versus standard cannulation for biliary access in ERCP.
  • To evaluate NKF as a primary technique for gaining biliary access.
  • To assess the potential of NKF to reduce the incidence of PEP.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 538 non-selective patients undergoing ERCP.
  • Patients will be randomized to either standard cannulation or the NKF technique.
  • Primary outcome is the incidence of PEP; secondary outcomes include cannulation success rates, time, and complication incidence.

Main Results:

  • This section is to be filled after the study's completion.

Conclusions:

  • This randomized controlled trial is expected to provide critical data on the effectiveness and safety of the NKF technique.
  • Results could potentially lead to a shift in ERCP practices, aiming to reduce PEP incidence.
  • The study will clarify the role of NKF as an initial approach for biliary access in ERCP.
Abstract