Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns01:29

Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns

374
Microorganisms exhibit diverse oxygen requirements and growth patterns driven by their metabolic strategies and environmental adaptations. Oxygen, while essential for many organisms, can also be toxic under certain conditions, shaping how microorganisms grow and survive.Oxygen Requirements of MicroorganismsMicroorganisms are classified based on their ability to use or tolerate oxygen:● Obligate aerobes like Mycobacterium tuberculosis need oxygen for energy production, as it serves as the...
374
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals01:16

Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals

2.2K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
2.2K
Radical Reactivity: Overview01:11

Radical Reactivity: Overview

2.2K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.2K
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control01:27

Chemical Agents for Microbial Control

291
Chemicals play important roles in controlling microbial growth by targeting microbial structures and functions as sanitizers, antiseptics, disinfectants, and sterilants.Alcohols are commonly used sanitizers, effectively disrupting lipid membranes, which compromises cell integrity. They are also used as antiseptics and disinfectants due to their rapid action and versatility.Phenols and their derivatives phenolics , known for denaturing proteins and disrupting cell membranes, are particularly...
291
Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals01:02

Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals

2.0K
Radicals adjacent to electron‐withdrawing groups are called electrophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with nucleophilic alkenes. For example, the malonate radical, in which the radical center is flanked by two electron‐withdrawing groups, reacts readily with butyl vinyl ether, which consists of an electron‐donating oxygen substituent. The reaction between electrophilic malonate radical and nucleophilic vinyl ether is favored because the radical has a...
2.0K
Radical Reactivity: Concentration Effects01:20

Radical Reactivity: Concentration Effects

1.5K
In a radical reaction, the concentration of starting materials governs the selectivity of a radical. For example, the reaction between an alkyl halide and an alkene, in the presence of tin hydride and AIBN, begins with the generation of a tin radical. The generated radical then abstracts halogen from the alkyl halide, producing an alkyl radical. This alkyl radical can either react with tin hydride, yielding an alkane, or add to an alkene, generating a nitrile-stabilized radical, eventually...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multimodal antibacterial agents based on photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy: principles, design strategies and applications.

Chemical Society reviews·2026
Same author

Polymer fatigue: mechanism, mechanics and design.

Materials horizons·2026
Same author

Hidden caveats in tick dissection: engorgement level and complex tracheal network architecture compromise internal organ integrity.

Journal of insect science (Online)·2026
Same author

Temporal proteomic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 infected mouse lungs.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same author

Activatable smart contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging.

Smart molecules : open access·2026
Same author

Dietary glycyrrhizic acid improves growth performance and modulates upper respiratory microbiota in weaned piglets.

BMC veterinary research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

The Synergistic Effect of Visible Light and Gentamycin on Pseudomona aeruginosa Microorganisms
05:57

The Synergistic Effect of Visible Light and Gentamycin on Pseudomona aeruginosa Microorganisms

Published on: July 2, 2013

13.5K

Reactivity Differences Enable ROS for Selective Ablation of Bacteria.

Xiaofeng Wu1, Mengyao Yang1, Ji Seon Kim2

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Nanoscience, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03706, Republic of Korea.

Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English)
|February 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Researchers developed novel photodynamic agents that selectively eliminate Gram-positive bacteria by generating different reactive oxygen species (ROS). One agent effectively treated bacterial infections in mice, offering a new strategy for combating Gram-positive bacterial diseases.

Keywords:
Antibacterial AgentsGram-Positive BacteriaPhotodynamic TherapyReactivity DifferenceSelective Ablation

More Related Videos

Real-Time Quantification of Reactive Oxygen Species in Neutrophils Infected with Meningitic Escherichia Coli
11:00

Real-Time Quantification of Reactive Oxygen Species in Neutrophils Infected with Meningitic Escherichia Coli

Published on: April 20, 2021

4.5K
Detecting, Visualizing and Quantitating the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species in an Amoeba Model System
16:41

Detecting, Visualizing and Quantitating the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species in an Amoeba Model System

Published on: November 5, 2013

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

The Synergistic Effect of Visible Light and Gentamycin on Pseudomona aeruginosa Microorganisms
05:57

The Synergistic Effect of Visible Light and Gentamycin on Pseudomona aeruginosa Microorganisms

Published on: July 2, 2013

13.5K
Real-Time Quantification of Reactive Oxygen Species in Neutrophils Infected with Meningitic Escherichia Coli
11:00

Real-Time Quantification of Reactive Oxygen Species in Neutrophils Infected with Meningitic Escherichia Coli

Published on: April 20, 2021

4.5K
Detecting, Visualizing and Quantitating the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species in an Amoeba Model System
16:41

Detecting, Visualizing and Quantitating the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species in an Amoeba Model System

Published on: November 5, 2013

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Photodynamic therapy
  • Antimicrobial strategies
  • Chemical biology

Background:

  • Developing selective photodynamic agents to combat bacterial infections, particularly Gram-positive strains, is a significant challenge.
  • Existing methods often lack specificity, leading to collateral damage to host cells or beneficial bacteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To engineer novel photodynamic agents with distinct reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation profiles for selective bacterial ablation.
  • To demonstrate the proof-of-concept for differential ROS generation in targeting Gram-positive bacteria.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesis of sulfur-substituted (NBS-N) and selenium-substituted (NBSe-N) phenoxazinium compounds.
  • Evaluation of ROS generation (superoxide anion radical vs. singlet oxygen) by the synthesized compounds.
  • Assessment of bacterial killing efficacy against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using fluorescence imaging and morphological analysis.
  • In vivo efficacy testing of NBS-N in a mouse model of Gram-positive bacterial infection.

Main Results:

  • NBS-N primarily generated superoxide anion radicals, selectively killing Gram-positive bacteria.
  • NBSe-N produced higher levels of singlet oxygen, effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
  • Bacterial fluorescence imaging and morphological changes confirmed the selective and differential bacterial ablation.
  • NBS-N demonstrated successful healing of Gram-positive bacterial-infected wounds in mice.

Conclusions:

  • Differential ROS generation by tailored photodynamic agents can achieve selective Gram-positive bacterial eradication.
  • The developed strategy offers a promising approach for designing targeted antimicrobial therapies.
  • This work paves the way for new photodynamic agents to address Gram-positive bacterial infections.