Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025
An In Vitro Model to Study the Effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-mediated Photodynamic Therapy on Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm
Published on: April 16, 2018
A prospective study of adverse reactions of ALA-PDT for acne vulgaris
Lei Shi1, Jiayi Yang1, Linglin Zhang1
1Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 1278 Baode Road, Shanghai 200092, China.
Background:
Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disease around pilosebaceous unit. 5-Aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) is an effective therapy for severe acne vulgaris. However, the lack of detailed information of adverse reactions limits the promotion of ALA-PDT in clinic.
Objective:
To systemically investigate the adverse reactions relating to ALA-PDT for acne vulgaris.
Methods:
A prospective study was performed at the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital.
Results:
In the prospective study, 35 patients with acne vulgaris completed the trial. The adverse reactions were first divided into acute-phase adverse reactions, including erythema (94.3%), post-treatment pain (91.4%), burning skin (91.4%), dry skin (91.4%), itching (85.7%), pustule (82.9%), edema (20%) and blister (11.4%), or recovery-phase adverse reactions, which included crust (65.6%), exudation (48.6%) and hyperpigmentation (42.7%). Younger patients were more likely to have pustules (P<0.05). Male patients were represented itching more often than female patients (P<0.05). The efficacy of ALA-PDT for severe acne was positively related to the severity of acute-phase adverse reactions. The duration of pain was shortest. Crusting and hyperpigmentation lasted considerably longer.
Conclusion:
In the present study, we recorded the relative incidence of various adverse reactions following ALA-PDT for acne vulgaris. The severity of adverse reactions tended to decrease with increased patient age, except for itching and hyperpigmentation. Light-to-moderate adverse reactions might be the inflammatory reactions of ALA-PDT, predicting a good efficacy. A form for evaluation of adverse reactions based on the present study could assist dermatologists in predicting and managing adverse reactions for greater efficacy and higher patient satisfaction.
