Healthcare Utilization and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Chronic Prurigo and Chronic Pruritus in Germany
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025
The Goeckerman Regimen for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
Published on: July 11, 2013
Sonja Ständer1, Claudia Garbe2, Kristina Hagenström2
1Department of Dermatology and Center for Chronic Pruritus, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Background:
To date, there have been no large studies describing real-world treatment of chronic prurigo (CPG) and pruritus (CPR) in Germany.
Objective:
To determine the healthcare utilization, treatment patterns, and costs associated with CPG and CPR in Germany.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis using anonymized claims data (German DAK-Gesundheit), based on a 40% sample of all insured adults of the DAK-Gesundheit on December 31, 2010 (N = 2,006,003).
Results:
Patients with CPR (prevalence 2.2%) most commonly visited general medicine/general practitioners (GPs, 80.1%), followed by gynecologists (66.1%) and dermatologists (51.1%). Patients with CPG (prevalence 0.2%) most commonly visited dermatologists (85.7%), GPs (78.1%), and ophthalmologists (47.2%). Of adult patients, 44% received at least one drug prescription. Two thirds of patients with a drug prescription received ≥1 topical drug (66.2%), and 54.3% ≥1 systemic drug (total costs of approximately EUR 550,000 and 2,500,000, respectively). Of patients with CPG, 33.8% received ≥1 systemic and 45.1% ≥1 topical drug prescription (costs of approximately EUR 360,000 vs. 105,000). Of patients with CPR, 23.5% received ≥1 systemic and 28.6% ≥1 topical drug prescription (costs of approximately EUR 2,000,000 vs. 500,000). Of patients with CPG, 5.8% received ≥1 phototherapy application vs. 1.2% of patients with CPR.
Conclusions:
These findings reflect the reality of care and can form a basis for the identification of overuse, underuse, and misuse in order to design CPG and CPR healthcare more effectively and efficiently.
