Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

06:34
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
4.1K
Assessment and validation of a novel fast fully automated artificial intelligence left ventricular ejection fraction
Rajeev Samtani1, Solomon Bienstock1, Ashton C Lai1
1The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
|February 18, 2022
Summary
Artificial intelligence software LVivoEF accurately quantifies left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiograms, matching physician measurements. This AI tool offers a faster, more precise method for LVEF assessment compared to traditional techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification via transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is often subjective, time-intensive, and prone to errors.
- LVivoEF is an AI-powered software designed for rapid LVEF assessment by automatically tracking endocardial borders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of LVivoEF in quantifying LVEF.
- To compare LVivoEF's performance against physician-measured LVEF (MD-EF) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) as the reference standard.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 273 patients, where AI-derived LVEF and MD-EF were assessed against cMRI.
- AI-derived LVEF was generated from a standard four-chamber view without manual adjustments or ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs).
- Exclusion criteria included interval interventions, incomplete studies, or uninterpretable views, resulting in a final analysis of 242 subjects.
Main Results:
- AI-derived LVEF demonstrated strong correlation with cMRI (r=0.890), comparable to MD-EF (r=0.891).
- In studies with UEAs (n=126), AI correlation was r=0.89 versus MD-EF's r=0.90.
- In unenhanced studies (n=116), AI correlation was r=0.87 versus MD-EF's r=0.84. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 3.63 ± 7.40% for LVivoEF versus cMRI.
Conclusions:
- LVivoEF accurately quantifies LVEF from a standard apical four-chamber view without manual correction, validated against cMRI.
- The AI software shows potential to enhance and accelerate LVEF quantification in clinical practice.

