Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

8.4K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
8.4K
Genomics02:02

Genomics

37.8K
Genomics is the science of genomes: it is the study of all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genome consists of information carried in 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus, as well as mitochondrial DNA. In genomics, both coding and non-coding DNA is sequenced and analyzed. Genomics allows a better understanding of all living things, their evolution, and their diversity. It has a myriad of uses: for example, to build phylogenetic trees, to improve productivity and...
37.8K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.4K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.4K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

19.5K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
19.5K
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

5.0K
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
5.0K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

14.4K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
14.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Codelivery Material System of Polymer Microfiber Structures for Synergistic Localized Therapy of Glioblastoma.

ACS biomaterials science & engineering·2026
Same author

Picogram-level detection of endotoxin in human saliva using ultrasensitive surface enhanced Raman scattering in lateral flow assay devices.

RSC advances·2025
Same author

Skin-compatible Carbopol<sup>®</sup> Electrospun Fiber Membranes with pH-Dependent Rheological Properties for Biomedical Applications.

Macromolecular materials and engineering·2025
Same author

Electrospinning of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives for human dural repair in endonasal surgery.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2021
Same author

Aptamer-Based Lateral Flow Biosensor for Rapid Detection of Salivary Cortisol.

ACS omega·2021
Same author

<i>In vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> evaluation of microneedles coated with electrosprayed micro/nanoparticles for medical skin treatments.

Journal of microencapsulation·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Automated Robotic Liquid Handling Assembly of Modular DNA Devices
11:22

Automated Robotic Liquid Handling Assembly of Modular DNA Devices

Published on: December 1, 2017

12.6K

Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks.

Joseph Riolo1, Andrew J Steckl2

  • 1Nanoelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0030, USA.

Scientific Reports
|February 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Designing synthetic organisms requires understanding genome complexity. This study compares natural genome sizes to engineering benchmarks, finding large software programs are comparable to complex organism genomes.

More Related Videos

DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation
09:26

DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation

Published on: December 29, 2021

4.4K
qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping
07:00

qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping

Published on: May 25, 2015

17.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Automated Robotic Liquid Handling Assembly of Modular DNA Devices
11:22

Automated Robotic Liquid Handling Assembly of Modular DNA Devices

Published on: December 1, 2017

12.6K
DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation
09:26

DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation

Published on: December 29, 2021

4.4K
qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping
07:00

qPCRTag Analysis - A High Throughput, Real Time PCR Assay for Sc2.0 Genotyping

Published on: May 25, 2015

17.3K

Area of Science:

  • Synthetic biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioengineering

Background:

  • Predictive understanding of genome sequence-phenotype relationships is key for designing synthetic organisms.
  • The feasibility of synthetic biology is not guaranteed by its possibility, analogous to encryption security.
  • Natural genome sizes vary greatly, necessitating an evaluation of practical limits for designing complex genomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the complexity of natural genomes.
  • To compare natural genome complexity to existing engineering benchmarks.
  • To assess the feasibility of designing synthetic genomes of comparable complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of natural genome sizes across diverse organisms (bacteria to plants).
  • Comparison of genome complexity metrics against established engineering benchmarks.
  • Evaluation of large-scale software program complexity as an engineering reference.

Main Results:

  • Natural genomes range from millions to over 100 billion base pairs.
  • Existing large software programs exhibit complexity on a similar scale to complex natural genomes.
  • This suggests potential engineering parallels for synthetic genome design.

Conclusions:

  • The scale of natural genomes presents significant engineering challenges for synthetic biology.
  • Comparing genome complexity to software engineering provides a valuable benchmark.
  • Further research is needed to bridge the gap between synthetic biology's possibility and its practical feasibility.