Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

41.7K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
41.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multidisciplinary assessment of endocrine and morphometric correlates of lactation physiology in southern right whales.

Conservation physiology·2026
Same author

Multiyear Baleen Endocrine Profiles Suggest a Longer Estimated Gestation in Southern Right Whales (<i>Eubalaena australis</i>).

Ecology and evolution·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

DNA-based Fish Species Identification Protocol
09:15

DNA-based Fish Species Identification Protocol

Published on: April 28, 2010

29.6K

Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols.

Loraine Shuttleworth1, Carel Jakobus Oosthuizen2

  • 1Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa.

Scientific Reports
|February 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated DNA extraction methods for teleost fish scales, crucial for conservation genetics. Phenol/chloroform with TNES-urea buffer yielded the most DNA, though all methods provided sufficient genetic material.

More Related Videos

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

39.5K
Improved Polymerase Chain Reaction-restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Genotyping of Toxic Pufferfish by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
09:34

Improved Polymerase Chain Reaction-restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Genotyping of Toxic Pufferfish by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

Published on: September 20, 2016

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

DNA-based Fish Species Identification Protocol
09:15

DNA-based Fish Species Identification Protocol

Published on: April 28, 2010

29.6K
Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

39.5K
Improved Polymerase Chain Reaction-restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Genotyping of Toxic Pufferfish by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
09:34

Improved Polymerase Chain Reaction-restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Genotyping of Toxic Pufferfish by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

Published on: September 20, 2016

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Conservation Biology
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Ichthyology

Background:

  • Genetic diversity and adaptive potential studies are vital for species conservation.
  • Non-invasive sampling, like using fish scales, is preferred for endangered species DNA analysis.
  • Reliable DNA extraction from biological samples is essential for genetic research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare different DNA extraction protocols for teleost fish scales.
  • To identify an optimal method for maximizing DNA yield from archived scales.
  • To assess the suitability of extracted DNA for downstream genetic applications.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated three DNA extraction protocols: phenol/chloroform with TNES-urea buffer, phenol/chloroform with amniocyte buffer, and Qiagen DNeasy Kit.
  • Varied incubation times and temperatures for each protocol.
  • Quantified DNA yield from extracted samples.

Main Results:

  • Phenol/chloroform with TNES-urea digestion buffer resulted in significantly higher DNA concentrations.
  • All tested protocols yielded sufficient DNA quantities for downstream genetic analyses.
  • Protocol effectiveness depends on specific research needs and resources.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple DNA extraction protocols are viable for teleost fish scales.
  • The choice of protocol should align with project-specific requirements, including resource availability.
  • Successful DNA extraction from fish scales supports conservation genetics research.