Development and validation of hypertension prediction models: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study_Cardiovascular

Hyun Kyung Namgung1,2, Hye Won Woo2,3, Jinho Shin4

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Graduate School of Public Health, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

Insights

The Framingham-based hypertension risk model (F-CAVAS-HTN) showed better internal validation than models with additional factors or from other populations. Further studies are needed to enhance its external validity for hypertension prediction.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology
  • Hypertension Risk Prediction Modeling
  • Biostatistics and Predictive Analytics

Background:

  • Accurate hypertension risk prediction is crucial for cardiovascular disease prevention.
  • Existing models like the Framingham risk score require validation and potential refinement in diverse populations.
  • The CArdioVascular disease Association Study (CAVAS) provides a unique dataset for developing and validating such models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and internally validate hypertension risk prediction models using CAVAS data.
  • To externally validate these models and compare them against established Framingham and population-specific models.
  • To assess the predictive performance, calibration, and reclassification accuracy of the developed models.

Main Methods:

  • 6,186 participants without hypertension were randomly assigned to derivation (60%) and internal validation (40%) sets.
  • Two models were derived: F-CAVAS-HTN (using Framingham factors) and CAVAS-HTN (including additional factors via Weibull regression).
  • External validation involved Ansan and Ansung (A&A) participants; internal validation of Framingham (F-HTN) and A&A (A&A-HTN) models used the CAVAS internal set. Performance metrics included C-statistic, Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, and net reclassification.

Main Results:

  • All four models demonstrated good discrimination (C-statistic ≥ 0.7).
  • F-CAVAS-HTN models exhibited good internal calibration (H-L χ² < 20, P ≥ 0.05).
  • CAVAS-HTN, F-HTN, and A&A-HTN models showed poor external calibration (H-L χ² ≥ 20 or P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • The F-CAVAS-HTN model, derived from Framingham factors within the CAVAS cohort, appears more reliable for internal prediction than models incorporating additional factors or derived from different populations.
  • Significant discrepancies in external calibration were observed for CAVAS-HTN, F-HTN, and A&A-HTN models, highlighting the challenges of generalizability.
  • While F-CAVAS-HTN shows promise, further research is necessary to improve its external validity for broader hypertension risk prediction.

Related Concept Videos

Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:30

Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

Hypertension is asymptomatic and also referred to as the "silent killer" until it progresses to a severe stage or causes target organ disease. Patients may experience symptoms stemming from the strain on blood vessels and tissues in various organs or the heart's increased workload.Physical exams might show no abnormalities other than high blood pressure. Signs of vascular damage, when present, correspond to the organs supplied by the affected vessels, leading to target organ damage. For...
67
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
14.5K
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure01:18

Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure

Hypertension, the most common cardiovascular disease, is diagnosed through repeated measurements of elevated blood pressure. Its risks, including damage to the kidney, heart, and brain, are directly proportional to blood pressure levels. Starting from 115/75 mm Hg, the risk of cardiovascular disease doubles with each increment of 20/10 mm Hg. The diagnosis relies on blood pressure measurements, not on patient symptoms, as hypertension is often asymptomatic until end-organ damage is imminent or...
3.2K
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology01:29

Hypertension II: Pathophysiology

Hypertension is a chronic condition in which the blood's force against artery walls is excessively high, posing risks such as heart disease. The condition's underlying mechanisms involve complex interactions among the cardiovascular, kidney, and autonomic nervous systems.Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS): This system significantly influences blood pressure regulation. When blood pressure decreases, the kidneys secrete renin. This enzyme transforms angiotensinogen, a plasma protein,...
130
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
644
Hypertension I: Introduction01:28

Hypertension I: Introduction

Hypertension is a widespread, long-term medical condition where blood pressure in the arteries remains elevated. It is characterized by systolic blood pressure readings of 130 mm Hg or above or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) readings of 80 mm Hg or higher. Unmanaged hypertension poses significant health risks, making the distinction between primary (or essential) hypertension and secondary hypertension crucial, as their management and implications vary.Primary HypertensionPrimary hypertension,...
116