Quality of biomarker defined subgroups in FDA approvals of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors 2014 to 2020

Myung S Kim1, Alexander Xu2, Alyson Haslam3

  • 1Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Insights

Most cancer drug approvals using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors lack detailed subgroup analyses for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. This limits understanding of differential treatment responses in specific patient groups.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Clinical Trial Analysis

Background:

  • Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression influences patient response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer.
  • Regulatory approvals for these immunotherapies often involve limited subgroup analyses based on PD-L1 expression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize PD-L1 defined subgroups within clinical trials leading to FDA approvals for new indications of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
  • To assess how PD-L1 subgroup analyses have evolved in trials supporting regulatory approvals.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewed FDA approvals for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (January 2014-December 2020).
  • Collected data on regulatory and trial characteristics, including subgroup analysis design (none, 2-group, nested, adjacent).
  • Compared trial designs and biomarker criteria between nested and adjacent subgroup studies.

Main Results:

  • Out of 60 approvals, 20% lacked PD-L1 subgroups, 42% had only two subgroups, 23% used adjacent subgroups, and 15% used nested subgroups.
  • 42% of trials were single-arm studies.
  • No significant differences were found between nested and adjacent subgroup trial designs.

Conclusions:

  • FDA approvals for new indications of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are frequently based on trials lacking comprehensive outcome reporting across PD-L1 biomarker subgroups.
  • This highlights a gap in fully understanding treatment efficacy across diverse patient populations defined by PD-L1 status.