Pain feedback interferes with reward positivity production
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Progressive-ratio Responding for Palatable High-fat and High-sugar Food in Mice
Published on: May 3, 2012
Sepideh Heydari1, Clay B Holroyd2
1Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract:
The reinforcement learning (RL) theory of the reward positivity (RewP) proposes that RewP indexes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal processed in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). According to this theory, RewP is an event-related potential (ERP) that is more positive-going for feedback stimuli that predict better-than-expected outcomes (positive feedback) than for feedback stimuli that predict worse-than-expected outcomes (negative feedback). Despite strong evidence for this hypothesis, findings have been equivocal for tasks involving painful outcomes. We hypothesized that the RewP is modulated by high-level task goals such that outcomes that are congruent with the goals elicit positive RPEs even if their immediate consequences are negative. Accordingly, changes in high-level task goals should modulate RewP amplitude for tasks that involve seeking pain compared to tasks that involve avoiding pain. We recorded the electroencephalogram from participants who were instructed to navigate a virtual T-Maze to find reward-predictive feedback in a reward condition and pain-predictive feedback in a pain condition. We expected more positive-going ERPs to reward feedback in the reward condition and more positive-going ERPs to pain feedback in the pain condition. Despite behavioral results indicating that participants complied with task instructions, contrary to our predictions, we did not find a RewP to pain feedback. We suggest that pain feedback interfered with the effect of high-level task goals on RewP amplitude, which is indicative of conflict at different levels of task hierarchy.
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops
Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...

