Variation in antisaccadic response latencies investigated with the hierarchical LATER process model

The antisaccade paradigm is frequently applied to measure inhibitory control. Typically, simple, perceptually neutral stimuli are used as cues. Recently, emotional versions of this paradigm have also been employed. In our study, we used both versions of the paradigm. In addition, scrambled faces served to control for stimulus size and emotional valence. We applied a hierarchical extension to the Linear Approach to Threshold Ergodic Rate (LATER) process model, which allows the estimation of two latent cognitive parameters: speed of information accumulation (accretion rate) and the amount of information needed before a saccadic movement (caution threshold). We hypothesized a faster accretion rate and lower caution threshold for circular and scrambled compared to emotional face stimuli as well as meaningful differences between individual emotions. Our results showed a faster accretion rate and lower caution threshold for emotional compared to circular stimuli, though. In contrast, scrambled faces had a lower accretion rate and lower caution threshold. Furthermore, the LATER model uncovered subtle differences between different emotions. Happy faces tend to receive a faster accretion rate and higher caution threshold than neutral ones, while for fearful faces it was the other way around. Our results contradict earlier research on emotional stimuli interfering inhibitory control.