Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation of a Genetics Education Program for Health Interpreters: A Pilot Study
Miranda E Vidgen1, Lindsay F Fowles2,3, Satrio Nindyo Istiko3
1QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Frontiers in Genetics
|February 21, 2022
Summary
Health Interpreter training improved genetics knowledge, with gains sustained for six months. While attitudes and self-efficacy did not change, the training was deemed useful and relevant by participants.
Area of Science:
- Medical Communication
- Genetics Education
- Health Equity
Background:
- Effective communication is crucial in healthcare, especially for patients with limited language proficiency.
- Health Interpreters play a vital role in bridging communication gaps between healthcare providers and patients.
- Genetics presents unique communication challenges due to complex terminology and concepts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate an online training session on genetics for Health Interpreters.
- To assess the impact of this training on interpreters' knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and practice behavior.
- To determine the long-term retention of learned knowledge and participant satisfaction.
Main Methods:
- An online, 2-hour training session combining lectures and activities was delivered.
- Participants completed pre-, post-, and 6-month follow-up questionnaires.
- Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (Fisher's Exact, independent t-test).
Main Results:
- 118 Health Interpreters participated, showing significant knowledge improvement post-training, sustained at 6 months (p < 0.01).
- No significant changes were observed in self-efficacy or attitudes towards genetics.
- Training did not alter self-reported practice behavior, though initial variability in managing genetic terms was noted.
Conclusions:
- The training was acceptable to Health Interpreters, demonstrating sustained knowledge enhancement in genetic concepts.
- While useful and relevant, the training did not impact self-efficacy or practice behavior.
- Further research with larger cohorts is recommended to validate findings and assess patient impact.