Superior thermoelectric properties of ternary chalcogenides CsAg5Q3 (Q = Te, Se) predicted using first-principles
Un-Gi Jong1, Chung-Jin Kang1, Su-Yong Kim1
1Chair of Computational Materials Design (CMD), Faculty of Materials Science, Kim Il Sung University, PO Box 76, Pyongyang, Democratic People's Republic of Korea. ug.jong@ryongnamsan.edu.kp.
Abstract:
Tailoring novel thermoelectric materials (TEMs) with a high efficiency is challenging due to the difficulty in realizing both low thermal conductivity and high thermopower factor. In this work, we propose ternary chalcogenides CsAg5Q3 (Q = Te, Se) as promising TEMs based on first-principles calculations of their thermoelectric properties. Using lattice dynamics calculations within self-consistent phonon theory, we predict their ultralow lattice thermal conductivities below 0.27 W m-1 K-1, revealing the strong lattice anharmonicity and rattling vibrations of Ag atoms as the main origination. By using the mBJ exchange-correlation functional, we calculate the electronic structures with the direct band gaps in good agreement with experiments, and evaluate the charge carrier lifetime as a function of temperature within the deformation potential theory. Our calculations to solve Boltzmann transport equations demonstrate high thermopower factors of 2.5 mW m-1 K-2 upon p-type doping at 300 K, comparable to the conventional dichalcogenide thermoelectric GeTe. With these ultralow thermal conductivities and high thermopower factors, we determine a relatively high thermoelectric figure of merit ZT along the z-axis, finding the maximum value of ZT to be 2.5 at 700 K for CsAg5Se3 by optimizing the hole concentration. Our computational results highlight the great potentiality of CsAg5Q3 (Q = Te, Se) for high-performance thermoelectric devices operating at room temperature.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Types Of Superconductors


