Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Long-term outcomes after ascending aortic replacement and aortic root replacement for type A aortic dissection.
Mikko Jormalainen1, Risto Kesävuori2, Peter Raivio1
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Supracoronary ascending aorta replacement offers similar long-term survival and reoperation rates compared to aortic root replacement for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD). Both surgical approaches provide comparable clinical outcomes when stringent selection criteria are applied.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Aortic Dissection Research
Background:
- Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring prompt surgical intervention.
- Surgical strategies for TAAD often involve either ascending aortic replacement or aortic root replacement, with ongoing debate regarding optimal late outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the late clinical outcomes, specifically mortality and need for reoperation, between supracoronary ascending aorta replacement and aortic root replacement in patients with acute TAAD.
- To evaluate the efficacy of selective surgical strategies for proximal aortic reconstruction in TAAD.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 309 patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAD between 2005 and 2018 at Helsinki University Hospital.
- Kaplan-Meier method for late mortality and competing risk method for proximal aortic reoperation were employed.
- Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between the two surgical groups.
Main Results:
- At 10 years, no significant difference in mortality was observed between aortic root replacement (33.8%) and ascending aortic replacement (35.2%) (P=0.806).
- Cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation was similar, with 6.0% for aortic root replacement and 6.2% for ascending aortic replacement (P=0.65).
- In propensity score matched pairs, 10-year survival was comparable (34.4% vs. 36.2%, P=0.70), though reoperation rates showed a trend (7.0% vs. 13.0%, P=0.22).
Conclusions:
- Selective use of supracoronary ascending aorta replacement achieves late clinical outcomes comparable to aortic root replacement for acute TAAD.
- Stringent selection criteria for proximal aortic reconstruction are crucial for achieving similar outcomes between the two surgical approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

