Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Multi-Modal Signals for Analyzing Pain Responses to Thermal and Electrical Stimuli
Published on: April 5, 2019
Conditioned Pain Modulation in Children: The Effects of Painful and Nonpainful Conditioning Stimuli
Jessica L Hoehn1, Lynnda M Dahlquist1, Julia A Zeroth1
1Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.
Insights
Children as young as 6 demonstrate conditioned pain modulation (CPM), a key indicator of pain inhibition. This study confirms CPM in children, suggesting developed pain inhibitory pathways from a young age.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric pain research
- Neuroscience of pain modulation
- Psychophysics
Background:
- Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) assesses endogenous pain inhibition but is understudied in children.
- Existing research suggests CPM is present in adolescents but less understood in younger children.
- Previous studies often fail to control for distraction effects of the conditioning stimulus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in healthy children aged 6-12 years.
- To determine if CPM effects differ across this age range.
- To control for potential sensory distraction effects of the conditioning stimulus.
Main Methods:
- 54 healthy children (6-12 years) underwent pressure pain threshold (PPT) testing.
- Two conditioning trials were used: a painful cold stimulus (12°C) and a non-painful sham stimulus (22°C).
- PPT was measured during both conditioning stimuli to assess inhibitory effects.
Main Results:
- A significant conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effect was observed.
- PPT was significantly higher during the painful conditioning stimulus compared to baseline.
- PPT during the non-painful stimulus did not differ from baseline, indicating specificity.
- No significant age differences in CPM magnitude were found.
Conclusions:
- Children as young as 6 years demonstrate CPM, indicating functional endogenous pain inhibition.
- These findings suggest that descending pain inhibitory pathways are well-developed in young children.
- The study successfully isolated CPM effects, ruling out sensory distraction as a confounding factor.
Abstract:
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM), a psychophysical measure in which 1 pain stimulus (conditioning stimulus) is used to inhibit another pain stimulus (test stimulus), is an important indicator of endogenous pain inhibition in adults, but is understudied in children. Preliminary evidence suggests that CPM effects are present in healthy children and are more robust in adolescents. However, developmental differences in younger children are not well documented and few studies control for potential distraction effects of the conditioning stimulus (CS). Participants were 54 healthy children aged 6 to 12 years. After a baseline pressure pain threshold (PPT) test, participants underwent 2 conditioning trials in which PPT was assessed while they placed their left hand in a water bath maintained at either 12 °C (painful CS) or 22 °C (nonpainful sham CS) in counterbalanced order. Results revealed a significant CPM effect. PPT values were significantly higher relative to baseline during the painful CS trial; PPT during the nonpainful CS trial did not differ from baseline. There were no significant age differences in magnitude of CPM effect. The results indicate that children as young as 6 years of age demonstrate CPM, suggesting that descending inhibitory pathways may be better developed in young children than previously thought. PERSPECTIVE: This study was successful in producing inhibitory CPM effects in physically healthy children while controlling for sensory distraction. The findings provide strong evidence that the obtained CPM responses cannot be attributed to sensory distraction or other nonspecific effects. Future studies could utilize CPM paradigms to study various aspects of pediatric endogenous pain inhibition, in order to better predict pain responses and improve interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Classical Conditioning in Daily Life
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...
Pain
Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...

