NBS1-CtIP-mediated DNA end resection suppresses cGAS binding to micronuclei

Salim Abdisalaam1, Shibani Mukherjee1, Souparno Bhattacharya1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

Nucleic Acids Research
|February 21, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (NBS1) protein prevents cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase (cGAS) from binding micronuclear DNA. NBS1, along with ATM and CtIP, acts upstream to regulate cGAS activation in DNA damage repair.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase (cGAS) activation is linked to defects in DNA damage repair and signaling (DDR) factors.
  • The precise role of DDR factors in regulating cGAS activation by micronuclear DNA remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (NBS1) protein and its associated factors in regulating cGAS activation in response to micronuclear DNA.
  • To elucidate the mechanism by which NBS1 prevents cGAS from binding to micronuclear DNA.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a cGAS tripartite system to assess cGAS activation.
  • Investigated protein interactions between NBS1, ATM, and CtIP in the context of micronuclear DNA.
  • Analyzed the binding of NBS1 to micronuclear DNA and its effect on DNA end resection.

Main Results:

  • NBS1 protein, in coordination with ATM and CtIP, functions as an upstream regulator preventing cGAS binding to micronuclear DNA.
  • NBS1 recruits ATM and CtIP to micronuclear DNA, where ATM stabilizes NBS1 binding and CtIP processes DNA ends, collectively inhibiting cGAS interaction.
  • Cells lacking NBS1 exhibit increased cGAS recruitment to and activation by micronuclear DNA.

Conclusions:

  • NBS1 and its partners ATM and CtIP play a crucial role in preventing aberrant cGAS activation by micronuclear DNA.
  • These findings reveal a novel function of NBS1 beyond its canonical role in DNA double-strand break repair signaling.
  • The study highlights the intricate interplay between DNA damage response pathways and innate immune signaling.