Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Sharing individual participant data: through a systematic reviewer lens
Larysa H M Rydzewska1, Lesley A Stewart2, Jayne F Tierney3
1MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute for Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK. larysa.rydzewska@ucl.ac.uk.
Data-sharing models for individual participant data (IPD) from clinical trials offer benefits for systematic reviews. However, current models have limitations, requiring standardized approaches for optimal IPD meta-analysis and secondary research.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Data Sharing
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- Health Data Science
Background:
- Growing availability of individual participant data (IPD) from clinical trials through various data-sharing models.
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses increasingly leverage IPD for enhanced research rigor.
Discussion:
- Assessment of diverse IPD data-sharing models, including traditional, topic-based repositories, and generic data platforms.
- Evaluation of the utility and challenges of current models from the perspective of experienced IPD reviewers.
- Identification of limitations in newer models that hinder the full realization of IPD advantages for meta-analysis.
Key Insights:
- Not all contemporary data-sharing platforms fully support the benefits of IPD for meta-analysis.
- Specific solutions are proposed to enhance both the quantity and utility of shared IPD.
- A unified and standardized approach is crucial for an optimal clinical data-sharing environment.
Outlook:
- Need for collaboration among data providers, requestors, funders, and platforms to establish a standardized data-sharing ecosystem.
- Potential for improved data quantity and utility through proposed solutions.
- Facilitating IPD meta-analysis and other secondary research purposes through a joined-up approach.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Archival Research
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Blind Procedures
Review and Preview
Case Studies