Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

112
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
112
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

3.2K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
3.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

3.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
3.6K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

2.9K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
2.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

13.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
13.1K
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

8.0K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Limited validity of an AI-powered app for dietary assessment in females with obesity.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

gllvm 2.0: fast fitting of advanced ordination methods and joint species distribution models.

PeerJ·2025
Same author

Two-stage sampling for better survival model performance.

BMC medical research methodology·2025
Same author

Adjusted predictions for generalized estimating equations.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

A Kidney Transplant Support System for Patient-Clinician Shared Decision-Making.

Journal of medical systems·2025
Same author

Inferential procedures for random effects in generalized linear mixed models.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Screening methods for linear errors-in-variables models in high dimensions.

Linh H Nghiem1,2, Francis K C Hui1, Samuel Müller3

  • 1Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Statistics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Biometrics
|February 22, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces two efficient screening methods, corrected penalized marginal screening (PMSc) and corrected sure independence screening (SISc), for analyzing high-dimensional microarray data using linear errors-in-variables models. These methods significantly reduce computational cost and improve variable selection accuracy.

Keywords:
dimension reductionforward regressionmeasurement errorpenalized regressionregularizationsure independence screening

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.7K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.7K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Microarray studies generate high-dimensional, noisy gene expression data from limited subjects.
  • Linear errors-in-variables (EIV) models are common for analyzing such data but are computationally intensive.
  • Efficient variable reduction is crucial for building accurate models in high-dimensional settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop computationally efficient screening procedures for high-dimensional data analyzed with linear EIV models.
  • To reduce the number of features for final model building, improving scalability and performance.
  • To enhance the accuracy of gene association studies.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced two novel screening procedures: corrected penalized marginal screening (PMSc) and corrected sure independence screening (SISc).
  • Both methods utilize corrected marginal regression models for efficient feature screening.
  • The procedures are designed to handle a large number of features relative to sample size.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that PMSc and SISc achieve screening consistency under mild conditions.
  • Showed substantial feature reduction even when the number of covariates grows exponentially with sample size.
  • PMSc demonstrated full variable selection consistency under weak correlation among true covariates.
  • Validated the methods through simulations and analysis of gene expression data for bone mineral density.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed PMSc and SISc procedures make linear EIV model estimation computationally scalable for high-dimensional data.
  • These screening methods improve both estimation and selection performance in finite samples.
  • The findings are applicable to gene expression analysis and other high-dimensional statistical modeling challenges.