Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Quality improvement intervention to stimulate early mobilisation of critically ill children
Tabitha Zanen-van den Adel1, Monique van Dijk2,3, Mariska de Heer2
1Department of Orthopedics, Section Physical Therapy, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Insights
Early mobilization programs for critically ill children are safe and feasible. Implementing these programs increases mobility activities and physical therapist involvement, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine
- Critical Care
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Immobility in hospitalized children leads to muscle weakness, delirium, and delayed neurocognitive recovery.
- Early mobilization (EM) in critically ill adults improves physical function and shortens mechanical ventilation duration.
- Research on EM for critically ill children is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of an early mobilization (EM) program on mobility in critically ill children.
- To identify barriers and facilitators to EM implementation.
- To evaluate clinical outcomes before and after EM program implementation.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, single-center, before-and-after study in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
- Inclusion criteria: Children aged 3 months to 18 years with expected PICU stay ≥3 days.
- Intervention: Multicomponent, multidisciplinary EM protocol implemented in the 'after' phase; usual care in the 'before' phase.
Main Results:
- Increased number of mobilization activities per patient per day (from 5 to 6, p < .001).
- Significant increase in physical therapist (PT) consultations for mobilization (23.6% to 46.5%, p = .011).
- No mobilization-related adverse events; PICU staff found EM feasible and beneficial, especially with PT support.
Conclusions:
- A structured early mobilization program for critically ill children is feasible and safe.
- Interdisciplinary team identification of local barriers and facilitators is recommended for successful implementation.
- Increased physical therapist presence enhances mobilization levels and supports staff and parents.
Background:
Immobility during hospital stay is associated with muscle weakness, delirium, and delayed neurocognitive recovery. Early mobilisation of critically ill adults improves their physical functioning and shortens the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, comparable research in children is lacking.
Aims:
To determine the effects of the implementation of an early mobilisation (EM) program on mobility activities for critically ill children and to explore barriers and facilitators and clinical outcomes before and after implementation.
Study Design:
A prospective single-centre before-and-after study. This study was conducted in a PICU of a large tertiary hospital. Children aged from 3 months to 18 years, with an expected stay of ≥3 days were eligible to participate. In the "before" phase, participants received usual care; in the "after" phase we implemented a multicomponent, multidisciplinary EM protocol. The primary outcome was a change in the process outcome "mobilisation activities". Secondary outcomes were PICU staff opinions on mobilisation (survey), safety, process measures, involvement of parents and physical therapist, and clinical outcomes (sedative use and prevalence of delirium).
Results:
A total of 113 children were included; 55 before and 58 after, with a median age of 31 months (IQR: 10-103) and 35 months (IQR: 7-152), respectively. The number of mobilisation activities (per patient per day) had significantly increased from 5 (IQR: 2-7) to 6 (IQR: 4-8) (U = 272185.0; p < .001). PT consultations for mobilisation had significantly increased from 23.6% (13/55) to 46.5% (27/58) (X2 = 6.48; p = .011). In both phases, no mobilisation-related adverse events were documented. The survey showed that PICU staff found EM of critically ill children useful and feasible. In the after phase, PICU staff rated the perceived benefit of the support of the physical therapist during mobilisation activities significantly higher than in the before phase (X2 = 34.80; p < .001).
Conclusions:
Implementation of a structured EM program for critically ill children is feasible and safe.
Relevance To Clinical Practice:
It is suggested to start the implementation of a structed EM program with the idendentification of local barriers and facilitators by an interdisciplinary PICU team. Further, an increased presence of physiotherapists on the PICU would improve mobilisation levels, and facilitate mobilisation in critically ill children. Also, they can support and advice PICU nurses and parents in mobilising children.
More Related Videos
07:20Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
11:50Clinical Practice Protocol of Creative Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Published on: January 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care