Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta-research Study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Using Continuous Data Tracking Technology to Study Exercise Adherence in Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Published on: November 8, 2013
Tiziano Innocenti1, Silvia Giagio2, Stefano Salvioli3
1Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, the Netherlands; GIMBE Foundation, Bologna, Italy.
Objective:
Primary: To evaluate the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in rehabilitation journals through the evaluation of the adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist and investigate the relationship between reporting and risk of bias (ROB). Secondary: To study the association between completeness of reporting and the characteristics of studies and journals.
Data Sources:
A random sample of 200 RCTs published between 2011 and 2020 in 68 rehabilitation journals indexed under the "rehabilitation" category in the InCites Journal Citation Report.
Study Selection:
One reviewer evaluated the completeness of reporting operationalized as the adherence to the CONSORT checklist. Two independent reviewers evaluated the ROB using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.
Data Extraction:
Overall adherence and adherence to each CONSORT section were calculated. Regression analyses investigated the association between completeness of reporting, ROB, and other characteristics (quartile range, publication modalities, study protocol registration).
Data Synthesis:
The mean overall CONSORT adherence across studies was 65%. Studies with high ROB have less adherence than those with low ROB (-5.5%; CI, -10.9 to 0.0). There was a 10.2% (% CI, 6.2-14.3) increase in adherence if the RCT protocol was registered. Studies published in first quartile journals displayed an overall adherence of 11.7% (% CI 17.1-6.4) higher than those published in the fourth quartile.
Conclusions:
Reporting completeness is still suboptimal and is associated with ROB, journal impact ranking, and registration of the study protocol. Trial authors should improve adherence to the CONSORT guideline, and journal editors should adopt new strategies to improve the reporting.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
03:26Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies