Echocardiographic assessment of primary microvascular angina and primary coronary microvascular dysfunction

There is an increasing interest in the role of echocardiography in the evaluation of primary microvascular angina, which is attributed to primary coronary microvascular dysfunction. Valid echocardiographic techniques are expected to facilitate the diagnosis and follow-up of these patients and would be valuable for research purposes and therapy evaluation. However, adequate echocardiographic data are lacking, and the interpretation of the limited available literature is hindered by the previous addition of microvascular angina under more inclusive entities, such as cardiac syndrome X. In experienced hands, the assessment of primary coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected primary microvascular angina, using multiple echocardiographic techniques is feasible, relatively inexpensive, and safe. Exclusion of obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease is, however, a prerequisite for diagnosis. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, routine stress echocardiography, and speckle-tracking echocardiography indirectly assess primary coronary microvascular dysfunction by evaluating potential impairment in myocardial function and lack diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Conversely, certain echocardiographic techniques, including Doppler-derived coronary flow velocity reserve and myocardial contrast echocardiography, assess some coronary microvascular dysfunction parameters and have exhibited diagnostic and prognostic potentials. Doppler-derived coronary flow velocity reserve is the best studied and only guideline-approved echocardiographic technique for documenting coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected microvascular angina. Myocardial contrast echocardiography, by comparison, can detect heterogeneous and patchy myocardial involvement by coronary microvascular dysfunction, which is an advantage over the common practice of coronary flow velocity reserve assessment in a single vessel (commonly the left anterior descending artery) which only reflects regional microvascular function. However, there is no consensus regarding the diagnostic criteria, and expertise performing this technique is limited. Echocardiography remains underexplored and inadequately utilized in the setting of microvascular angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction. Appraisal of the current echocardiographic literature regarding coronary microvascular dysfunction and microvascular angina is important to stay current with the progress in its clinical recognition and create a basis for future research and technological advancements.