Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies
Frédérique Dubois1, Pedro R Peres-Neto2
1Département de Sciences Biologiques, Complexe des Sciences, Université de Montréal, 1375 Avenue Thérèse-Lavoie-Roux, Montréal, (QC) H2V 0B3, Canada.
Abstract:
Conceptual advances and validation are critical to research, yet at odds. Using a game theoretical perspective, we show that a mixed strategy combining advances and validation, leads to increases in both individual researchers' and societal gains. This win-win outcome can be used to design new research strategies, funding, and recognition standards.
More Related Videos
07:43Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
Published on: August 4, 2023
09:08Integration of Bioinformatics Approaches and Experimental Validations to Understand the Role of Notch Signaling in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: January 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology