Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

115
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
115
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.7K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

250.7K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
250.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

29.1K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
29.1K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.6K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.6K
Survey Safety01:28

Survey Safety

197
Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
197

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond politics: additional factors underlying skepticism of a COVID-19 vaccine.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 2, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K

Trusting scientific experts in an online world.

Kenneth Boyd1

  • 1Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark.

Synthese
|February 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Online information seeking changes how we trust scientific experts. Susceptibility to manipulation becomes key, favoring cooperative experts over preemptive ones, altering trustworthiness criteria for online scientific information.

Keywords:
Expert testimonyOnline communicationScientific testimonySocial epistemology

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K
Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 2, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K
Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Social epistemology
  • Information science

Background:

  • Evaluating scientific information (e.g., climate change, vaccine safety) is challenging for the public due to specialized knowledge requirements.
  • Trustworthy expert testimony is crucial for laypersons to access accurate scientific information.
  • The internet has become a primary source for scientific information, presenting new challenges and opportunities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the online environment alters the evaluation of expert trustworthiness.
  • To challenge the assumption that traditional markers of trustworthiness apply equally in online and offline contexts.
  • To identify unique features of online information-seeking that influence expert evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of social epistemology and online information-seeking behaviors.
  • Argumentation regarding the unique characteristics of online environments and their impact on trust.
  • Introduction of the 'cooperative' versus 'preemptive' expert distinction.

Main Results:

  • The susceptibility of online information to manipulation emerges as a dominant marker of trustworthiness.
  • Online environments foster a preference for 'cooperative' experts over 'preemptive' ones.
  • Criteria for assessing expert trustworthiness differ significantly between online and offline information acquisition.

Conclusions:

  • Rethinking expert trustworthiness is necessary due to the unique nature of online information environments.
  • The shift towards cooperative experts online has implications for how scientific information is disseminated and received.
  • Future research should explore the practical applications of these findings in digital literacy and science communication.