Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Representing Graphs via Gromov-Wasserstein Factorization
Abstract:
Graph representation is a challenging and significant problem for many real-world applications. In this work, we propose a novel paradigm called "Gromov-Wasserstein Factorization" (GWF) to learn graph representations in a flexible and interpretable way. Given a set of graphs, whose correspondence between nodes is unknown and whose sizes can be different, our GWF model reconstructs each graph by a weighted combination of some "graph factors" under a pseudo-metric called Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) discrepancy. This model leads to a new nonlinear factorization mechanism of the graphs. The graph factors are shared by all the graphs, which represent the typical patterns of the graphs' structures. The weights associated with each graph indicate the graph factors' contributions to the graph's reconstruction, which lead to a permutation-invariant graph representation. We learn the graph factors of the GWF model and the weights of the graphs jointly by minimizing the overall reconstruction error. When learning the model, we reparametrize the graph factors and the weights to unconstrained model parameters and simplify the backpropagation of gradient with the help of the envelope theorem. For the GW discrepancy (the critical training step), we consider two algorithms to compute it, which correspond to the proximal point algorithm (PPA) and Bregman alternating direction method of multipliers (BADMM), respectively. Furthermore, we propose some extensions of the GWF model, including (i) combining with a graph neural network and learning graph representations in an auto-encoding manner, (ii) representing the graphs with node attributes, and (iii) working as a regularizer for semi-supervised graph classification. Experiments on various datasets demonstrate that our GWF model is comparable to the state-of-the-art methods. The graph representations derived by it perform well in graph clustering and classification tasks.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Vector Algebra: Graphical Method
We use the laws of geometry to construct resultant vectors, followed by trigonometry to find vector magnitudes and directions. For a geometric construction of the sum of two vectors in a plane, we follow the parallelogram rule. Suppose two vectors are at arbitrary positions. Translate either one of...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
Graphing the Wave Function
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
Fischer Projections
Graphical and Analytic Representation of Sinusoids
The first step is measuring the peak-to-peak value, which is twice the amplitude of the sinusoid. This provides information about the maximum voltage swing of the waveform.
Secondly, the period and angular frequency are determined. The period is the time taken for one complete cycle of the waveform, while...

