Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Convalescent Plasma Treatment in Patients with Covid-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Anselm Jorda1, Manuel Kussmann2, Nebu Kolenchery3
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Insights
Convalescent plasma (CP) treatment for Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality in a large meta-analysis. CP showed no benefit across different disease severities or baseline antibody statuses.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Immunology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Convalescent plasma (CP) emerged as a potential therapy for Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).
- Uncertainty existed regarding its clinical efficacy and impact on patient outcomes.
- This study aimed to rigorously assess CP's effectiveness in Covid-19 patients.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted.
- Searched major databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, medRxiv) up to October 17th, 2021.
- Included 16 RCTs with 16,317 Covid-19 patients, assessing all-cause mortality as the primary outcome.
Key Points:
- Overall all-cause mortality was similar between CP and standard care (23.8% vs. 24.4%, high-certainty evidence).
- No significant differences in mortality were observed in critically ill or non-critically ill subgroups.
- CP did not improve survival in patients negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline.
Conclusions:
- Convalescent plasma treatment, compared to control, was not associated with reduced all-cause mortality in Covid-19 patients.
- Disease progression metrics, including mechanical ventilation and time to discharge, showed no significant improvement with CP.
- Findings indicate CP lacks efficacy irrespective of disease severity or baseline antibody status.
Abstract:
Convalescent plasma is a suggested treatment for Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), but its efficacy is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of convalescent plasma is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with Covid-19.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched randomized controlled trials investigating the use of convalescent plasma in patients with Covid-19 in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and medRxiv from inception to October 17th, 2021. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method were used. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021284861. Of the 8874 studies identified in the initial search, sixteen trials comprising 16 317 patients with Covid-19 were included. In the overall population, the all-cause mortality was 23.8% (2025 of 8524) with convalescent plasma and 24.4% (1903 of 7769) with standard of care (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.04) (high-certainty evidence). All-cause mortality did not differ in the subgroups of noncritically ill (21.7% [1288 of 5929] vs. 22.4% [1320 of 5882]) and critically ill (36.9% [518 of 1404] vs. 36.4% [455 of 1247]) patients with Covid-19. The use of convalescent plasma in patients who tested negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline was not associated with significantly improved survival (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87-1.02). In the overall study population, initiation of mechanical ventilation (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.07), time to clinical improvement (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.30), and time to discharge (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.02) were similar between the two groups. In patients with Covid-19, treatment with convalescent plasma, as compared with control, was not associated with lower all-cause mortality or improved disease progression, irrespective of disease severity and baseline antibody status.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021284861).
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management

