Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells
Published on: June 23, 2023
Automated Cell Foreground-Background Segmentation with Phase-Contrast Microscopy Images: An Alternative to Machine
1Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
This study introduces an automated cell segmentation method for phase-contrast microscopy, improving accuracy and reliability in biological image analysis. The new technique outperforms existing software, even in challenging imaging conditions.
Area of Science:
- Cell biology
- Microscopy
- Image analysis
Background:
- Cell segmentation is crucial for analyzing microscopy images.
- Current methods lack full automation and struggle with basic lab microscopy.
- Phase-contrast microscopy is widely used but presents segmentation challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an efficient and automated cell segmentation method for phase-contrast microscopy images.
- To evaluate the method's performance against manual segmentation and existing software.
- To assess the method's robustness under varying imaging conditions.
Main Methods:
- An automated cell segmentation approach utilizing morphological operations.
- Performance evaluation using manual/visual counting as ground truth (156 images).
- Comparative analysis against Trainable Weka Segmentation, Empirical Gradient Threshold, and ilastik software.
- Assessment of adaptive performance under artificial blurriness, illumination changes, and varying image sizes.
- Validation using modified U-Net models trained on ground truth and generated data (16848 images).
Main Results:
- The proposed method achieved superior segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient: 90.07, IoU: 82.16%).
- Average relative error in cell area measurement was low (6.51%).
- The method demonstrated reliability under suboptimal imaging conditions where manual analysis is inefficient.
- Comparable segmentation accuracy was achieved when training U-Net models with either ground truth or method-generated data.
Conclusions:
- The developed method offers accurate and practical automated cell segmentation for phase-contrast microscopy.
- It provides a reliable alternative to manual segmentation, especially in difficult imaging scenarios.
- The technique shows high potential for enhancing biological image analysis workflows.
More Related Videos
07:05Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures
Published on: February 15, 2022
14:28Substructure Analyzer: A User-Friendly Workflow for Rapid Exploration and Accurate Analysis of Cellular Bodies in Fluorescence Microscopy Images
Published on: July 15, 2020