Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Simulating Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Using a Neonatal Piglet Model
Published on: May 26, 2023
ICD Outcome in Pediatric Cardiomyopathies
Massimo Stefano Silvetti1, Ilaria Tamburri1, Marta Campisi1
1Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Arrhythmia/Syncope Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are effective in pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy, preventing sudden cardiac death. Both transvenous and subcutaneous ICDs showed similar outcomes, with low complication rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pediatric Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies face high risks of malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD).
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing SCD in this population.
- Evaluating ICD implantation outcomes in pediatric cardiomyopathy patients is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the outcomes of ICD implantation in pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of transvenous ICDs versus subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) in this cohort.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, single-center study included pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies requiring ICD implantation between 2010 and 2021.
- Outcomes analyzed included appropriate/inappropriate ICD therapy and surgical complications.
- Comparative analysis between transvenous ICD and S-ICD groups.
Main Results:
- Forty-four pediatric patients (mean age 14 years) with various cardiomyopathies received either transvenous (52%) or S-ICDs (48%), primarily for primary prevention (73%).
- Appropriate ICD therapy was delivered in 25% of patients, with no defibrillation failures. Lower age and secondary prevention were risk factors for arrhythmias.
- Overall complication rates were 18% for surgical issues and 7% for inappropriate shocks, with no significant differences between ICD types or cardiomyopathy subgroups.
Conclusions:
- ICD therapy is effective in pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy, demonstrating a low rate of inappropriate shocks.
- Both transvenous and S-ICD systems exhibit comparable outcomes in this population.
- No significant differences in outcomes were observed across different cardiomyopathy subtypes.
Background:
Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies are at risk of malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). An ICD may prevent SCD. The aim of this study was to evaluate ICD implantation outcomes, and to compare transvenous and subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) implanted in pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies.
Methods:
The study is single center and retrospective, and includes pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies who required ICD implantation (2010-2021). Outcomes were recorded for appropriate/inappropriate ICD therapy and surgical complications. Transvenous ICD and S-ICD were compared. Data are presented as median values (25th-75th centiles).
Results:
Forty-four patients with cardiomyopathies (hypertrophic 39%, arrhythmogenic 32%, dilated 27%, and restrictive 2%) underwent transvenous (52%) and S-ICD (48%) implantation at 14 (12-17) years of age, mostly for primary prevention (73%). The follow-up period was 29 (14-60) months. Appropriate ICD therapies were delivered in 25% of patients, without defibrillation failures. Lower age at implantation and secondary prevention were significant risk factors for malignant ventricular arrhythmias that required appropriate ICD therapies. ICD-related complications were surgical complications (18%) and inappropriate shocks (7%). No significant differences in outcomes were recorded, either when comparing transvenous and S-ICD or comparing the different cardiomyopathies.
Conclusions:
In pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy, ICD therapy is effective, with a low rate of inappropriate shocks. Neither ICD type (transvenous and S-ICDs) nor the cardiomyopathies subgroup revealed divergent outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:04In vitro Assessment of Cardiac Reprogramming by Measuring Cardiac Specific Calcium Flux with a GCaMP3 Reporter
Published on: February 22, 2022
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis III: Medical Management