Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: October 28, 2021
Multiple Aerial Targets Re-Identification by 2D- and 3D- Kinematics-Based Matching.
Shao Xuan Seah1, Yan Han Lau2, Sutthiphong Srigrarom1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575, Singapore.
This study introduces two kinematics-based methods for matching and re-identifying multiple aerial targets using electro-optical devices. These techniques achieve over 80% MOTA without requiring image-based training, simplifying aerial target tracking.
Area of Science:
- Computer Vision
- Robotics
- Aerospace Engineering
Background:
- Traditional aerial target tracking often relies on image-based training, which can be computationally intensive and require extensive datasets.
- Re-identification of multiple targets across different sensors presents challenges in maintaining track continuity and accuracy.
- Existing methods may struggle with varying target appearances and complex motion patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate novel kinematics-based techniques for matching and re-identifying multiple aerial targets from multiple electro-optical devices.
- To offer an alternative to traditional image-based training methods by utilizing simpler graph matching algorithms.
- To assess the effectiveness of 2D and 3D kinematics-based approaches in real-world flight test scenarios.
Main Methods:
- A 2-dimensional (2D) method using kinematic and geometric projections of targets onto images, with matching via correlation-based techniques.
- A 3-dimensional (3D) method estimating focal axis motion from target size changes, constructing pose-independent direction vectors for matching in a global coordinate system.
- Both methods facilitate matching and re-identification across frames without explicit overlapping field-of-view requirements, provided targets are detected by multiple cameras.
Main Results:
- The proposed 2D method is effective for targets with distinct observed motion.
- The proposed 3D method is suitable for near to medium-range targets where changes in detection size are observable.
- Preliminary flight tests with 2-3 drones demonstrated the effectiveness of both techniques, achieving a Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy (MOTA) score exceeding 80%.
Conclusions:
- Kinematics-based matching and re-identification offer a viable alternative to image-based training for aerial target tracking.
- The developed 2D and 3D methods provide robust solutions for multi-camera aerial surveillance systems.
- The high MOTA score validates the practical applicability and efficiency of these novel tracking techniques.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...

