Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Comprehensive Protocol to Sample and Process Bone Marrow for Measuring Measurable Residual Disease and Leukemic Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: March 5, 2018
[Clinical value of various classifications in adults with AML]
111 adults with acute myeloid leukemia were classified according to the morphological, immunological and cytogenetic features of their leukemic cells. A comparison was made between the clinical parameters on prognosis of these subgroups. Hemoglobin was the only parameter among all six FAB-subgroups to show a statistical significant difference. Other differences found applied to a few subgroups only. Again, immunologically or cytogenetically characterized subgroups did not show significant differences in clinical parameters or prognosis. Patients with pseudodiploid or hyperdiploid karyotype had a lower remission rate than the remainder. However, a cluster analysis in which all three classifications together with the clinical parameters were considered was best able to characterize groups with different prognosis.
111 adults with acute myeloid leukemia were classified according to the morphological, immunological and cytogenetic features of their leukemic cells. A comparison was made between the clinical parameters on prognosis of these subgroups. Hemoglobin was the only parameter among all six FAB-subgroups to show a statistical significant difference. Other differences found applied to a few subgroups only. Again, immunologically or cytogenetically characterized subgroups did not show significant differences in clinical parameters or prognosis. Patients with pseudodiploid or hyperdiploid karyotype had a lower remission rate than the remainder. However, a cluster analysis in which all three classifications together with the clinical parameters were considered was best able to characterize groups with different prognosis.

