ARNI in HFrEF-One-Centre Experience in the Era before the 2021 ESC HF Recommendations
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Rafał Niemiec1, Irmina Morawska1, Maria Stec2
1Upper Silesian Medical Centre, First Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) use in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients showed similar mortality and rehospitalization rates compared to standard therapy. This real-world data suggests ARNI is effective even in complex HFrEF cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), is known to improve survival and reduce hospitalizations in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Real-world clinical practice data on ARNI use in HFrEF, especially before recent guidelines, is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the real-world clinical practice of ARNI use in hospitalized HFrEF patients.
- To assess the clinical outcomes (rehospitalization, death) associated with ARNI administration in this population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, one-center, cross-sectional analysis of 613 HFrEF patients hospitalized between 2018-2020.
- Patients were divided into ARNI (13.4%) and non-ARNI (82.6%) groups.
- Clinical outcomes including rehospitalization rates, number of rehospitalizations, time to first rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality were analyzed over a 1-2 year follow-up, with matching for age and LVEF.
Main Results:
- The ARNI group had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), CRT-D, atrial fibrillation, and prior stroke.
- While not statistically significant, the ARNI group showed a trend towards more severe HFrEF (NYHA III/IV).
- Rehospitalization rates, number of rehospitalizations, time to first rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality were comparable between ARNI and non-ARNI groups. Coronary artery disease was an independent negative predictor of death.
Conclusions:
- ARNI therapy in this real-world setting was primarily used in severely ill HFrEF patients with significant comorbidities.
- Despite more advanced disease and comorbidities, ARNI-treated patients experienced similar mortality and rehospitalization rates compared to those on standard therapy.
- This study supports the use of ARNI in complex HFrEF patients, demonstrating comparable outcomes to standard treatments.
Background:
Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), has demonstrated a survival benefit and reduces heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, our experience in this field is limited. This study aimed to summarize a real clinical practice of the use of ARNI in HFrEF patients hospitalized due to HFrEF in the era before the 2021 ESC HF recommendations, as well as assess their clinical outcome with regard to ARNI administration.
Methods And Materials:
Overall, 613 patients with HFrEF hospitalized in 2018-2020 were enrolled into a retrospective one-centre cross-sectional analysis. The study population was categorized into patients receiving (82/13.4%) and not-receiving (531/82.6%) ARNI. Clinical outcomes defined as rehospitalization, number of rehospitalizations, time to the first rehospitalization and death from any cause were analysed in the 1-2 year follow-up in the ARNI and non-ARNI groups, matched as to age and LVEF.
Results:
Clinical characteristics revealed the following differences between ARNI and non-ARNI groups: A higher percentage of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) (p = 0.014) and defibrillators with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) (p = 0.038), higher frequency of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.002) and history of stroke (p = 0.024) were in the ARNI group. The percentage of patients with HFrEF NYHA III/IV presented an increasing trend to be higher in the ARNI (64.1%) as compared to the non-ARNI group (51.5%, p = 0.154). Incidence of rehospitalization, number of rehospitalizations and time to the first rehospitalization were comparable between the groups. There were no differences between the numbers of deaths of any cause in the ARNI (28%) and non-ARNI (28%) groups. The independent negative predictor of death in the whole population of ARNI and non-ARNI groups was the coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (beta= -0.924, HR 0.806, p = 0.011).
Conclusions:
Our current positive experience in ARNI therapy is limited to extremely severe patients with HFrEF. Regardless of the more advanced HF and HF comorbidities, the patients treated with ARNI presented similar mortality and rehospitalizations as the patients treated by standard therapy.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents