Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

3.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
3.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

13.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
13.1K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.0K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.0K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

229
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
229
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

167
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
167
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

3.9K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Osmotic Demyelination Syndrome Presenting as Extrapyramidal Symptoms and Neuroleptic Sensitivity in a Patient With Focal Epilepsy: A Psychiatric Perspective.

The primary care companion for CNS disorders·2026
Same author

Nationwide Survey on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices regarding Reference Interval Utilization in Clinical Laboratories in Nepal.

EJIFCC·2026
Same author

Lead Toxicity Testing in the Asia-Pacific - Practices, Challenges, and Policy Insights: An APFCB Communication and Publications Committee Survey report.

EJIFCC·2026
Same author

Case-Based Analysis of Pre-analytical and Analytical Non-Conformities in Urinary Protein Testing.

EJIFCC·2026
Same author

Urgent Call for Action: Bridging Gaps in Asia-Pacific Laboratories' Transition to ISO 15189:2022.

EJIFCC·2026
Same author

Exploring Ethical Perspectives in Laboratory Medicine: A Survey of Laboratory Professionals at the Annual Conference in Nepal.

EJIFCC·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

16.1K

Variation in Laboratory Reports: Causes other than Laboratory Error.

Santosh Pradhan1, Keyoor Gautam2, Vivek Pant1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Samyak Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd, Lalitpur, Nepal.

JNMA; Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
|February 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Laboratory test results vary due to preanalytical, biological, and analytical factors, not just errors. Understanding these variations is crucial for accurate disease diagnosis and monitoring.

Keywords:
diagnosis; laboratory; report.

More Related Videos

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

24.0K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

16.1K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

24.0K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Clinical laboratory test results can differ significantly between measurements, even for the same individual in a stable health state.
  • These result disparities can complicate accurate disease diagnosis, treatment decisions, and patient monitoring.
  • Patients and healthcare providers often mistakenly attribute result variations solely to laboratory errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the inherent variability in clinical laboratory test results.
  • To differentiate between laboratory errors and other sources of result variation.
  • To highlight the impact of result variability on clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • This study reviews the fundamental sources of variation in laboratory testing.
  • It categorizes these variations into preanalytical, biological, and analytical components.
  • The review synthesizes existing knowledge on factors influencing test result consistency.

Main Results:

  • Laboratory test results exhibit inherent variability stemming from multiple sources beyond analytical error.
  • Preanalytical factors (e.g., sample collection, handling) significantly impact results.
  • Biological variations within an individual and analytical variations within the laboratory process also contribute to result differences.

Conclusions:

  • Variability in laboratory test results is multifactorial, including preanalytical, biological, and analytical influences.
  • Attributing all result discrepancies to laboratory error is often inaccurate.
  • Recognizing these diverse sources of variation is essential for appropriate interpretation of clinical laboratory data.