Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
Multifaceted Amblyopia Screening with blinq, 2WIN, and PDI Check.
1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's Eye and Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
Three novel devices were evaluated for screening amblyopia risk factors in pediatric patients. Each device showed unique strengths and weaknesses, highlighting the need for comprehensive validation methods beyond simple refraction.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Vision Screening
- Amblyopia Risk Factors
Background:
- Novel devices like Rebion blinq, Adaptica 2WIN, and PDI Check aim to identify amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) by assessing different visual parameters.
- These devices target binocular foveation, ocular alignment, and dynamic near-vision capabilities, addressing various facets of visual development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate and compare the performance of three novel vision screening devices (Rebion blinq, Adaptica 2WIN, PDI Check) in a pediatric ophthalmology clinic.
- To assess the effectiveness of these devices in identifying amblyopia risk factors according to current clinical guidelines.
Main Methods:
- New and returning pediatric patients underwent confirmatory eye exams after being screened with the three devices.
- Validation involved ROC curves, Bland-Altman plots, and ellipsoid grades, with outcomes classified by visual acuity, strabismus, binocularity, and refractive errors per 2021 AAPOS guidelines.
- The Bosque-Hunter rubric was used for blinq assessment.
Main Results:
- A cohort of 202 ethnically diverse students (aged 4-19) showed a high prevalence (58%) of ARFs.
- PDI Check and blinq demonstrated strong correlations with linear logMAR visual acuity, intereye differences, and stereo color vision.
- Sensitivity and specificity varied by device and screening criteria; for example, blinq showed high sensitivity (87%) for refractive error plus strabismus but low specificity (32%).
Conclusions:
- Each device possesses distinct advantages and limitations for screening older children with a high prevalence of ARFs, including those previously treated.
- Comprehensive validation methods are crucial, extending beyond refraction to encompass a broader range of visual functions as recommended by the 2021 AAPOS guidelines.
More Related Videos
06:19Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:45Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020