Validation of the Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformation Grading Scale in a pediatric cohort

Joseph H Garcia1, Caleb Rutledge1, Ethan A Winkler1

  • 11Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.

Insights

The Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformation Grading Scale (RAGS) effectively predicts outcomes in pediatric patients with ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). This validated scale improves upon existing methods for assessing hemorrhage severity in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurosurgery
  • Neurology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are a significant cause of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) in children, leading to considerable morbidity.
  • The Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformation Grading Scale (RAGS) was developed to predict clinical outcomes post-AVM rupture, analogous to the Hunt and Hess (HH) grade for aneurysms.
  • Pediatric patients were excluded from the initial RAGS validation study, necessitating evaluation of its applicability in this demographic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the RAGS score in a cohort of pediatric patients who experienced AVM rupture and hemorrhage.
  • To assess the generalizability and expand the external validity of the RAGS score in the pediatric population.
  • To compare the predictive performance of the RAGS score against established grading systems like the HH classification and Glasgow Coma Scale.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of a cohort of 81 children with ruptured AVMs.
  • Utilized the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) to measure disability as the outcome variable.
  • Calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for RAGS scores at three time points and compared it with HH and Glasgow Coma Scale scores.

Main Results:

  • The RAGS score demonstrated strong predictive capability for mRS scores in pediatric patients.
  • AUROC values for the RAGS score were consistently high at 0.81, 0.82, and 0.81 across three follow-up periods.
  • The RAGS score outperformed the HH classification and Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting clinical outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The RAGS score is a reliable tool for predicting clinical outcomes in pediatric patients following brain AVM rupture.
  • Further multi-center validation studies are recommended to confirm the broad generalizability of the RAGS scoring system.
  • The RAGS score offers a valuable addition to the assessment of ruptured AVMs in children.
Abstract